Google+

The Security of Interest
and Affidavit of Obligation

Your Key to Returning your Home to You

Security of Interest

Stage 2 of Notices
Sent to Mortgage Bandits



------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTICE - PLEASE READ
Lien by way of Affidavit of Obligation
Legal and Lawful Notice:

These processes are not to be taken as legal advice. They are lawful methodologies that have proven success and in the spirit of what works, pass on to share this information is proffered to help anyone caught in the entrapment of legal process. These processes are specifically encouraged to be used, where the person addressing a wrong wishes to not pass through the legal nightmare of court proceedings, as practiced by those resorting to the protection of an Admiralty/Maritime court.

This process denies them that protection and affords the fullest protection to the person questioning any and all allegations made against them under so called legal process. This process is committed under the auspices of the Common Law, that in itself is the highest law known to humankind, except Natural/Divine Law that supersedes it. Thus any attempt to contest this process through the courts is null and void and carries no jurisdiction within that lower level.

All processes have been available online for many years as originally created and used by Michael O'Bernicia. It is accepted that full credit is given to Michael O'Bernicia for all these documents available free to use by all who find them useful. It is also agreed that by using these indemnifies the author and this site from any change/misuse these documents might be used for or their outcomes. Their use by whosoever establishes this agreement is made.
======================
Terms of Use and Copyright Notice
This process is free for everybody to use, solely for the express purpose it was intended for, when it was originally published during the summer of 2020 , on MOB's blog site The Bernician.net.

A mandatory condition is and always has been that all who use it must hold harmless and indemnify the author from all potential liabilities, in the unlikely event that the process, when implemented correctly, does not result in the discharge of any fraudulent mortgage claim in the UK.

It can be shared, copied and re-posted, but not without giving due credit to its originating author. Failure to do so will automatically result in the termination of the offender’s right to use the process.

If any individual, group or entity is found to have used this process for commercial purposes, or in the event they have falsely purported to be the creators/owners of it, they will be held liable for copyright infringement and misrepresentation of the facts, nunc-pro-tunc. 
------------------------ 
ALL NOTICES sent signed for by Royal Mail, (to hold safely as proof of receipt and receipt number to be used later)

Terminology Used:
NAME OF MORTGAGOR - Is the Name on the Mortgage Deed
By: Upper-Case:Lower - By: Joanna Smith
Representative for NAME OF MORTGAGOR - Representative for JOANNA SMITH
ROBIN HOODY - Refers to and must be replaced by the company's CEO name.
ROBIN HOODIES - Refers to and must be replaced by the company's name.
LIEN DEBTOR = LIEN DEBTOR
STRAWMAN = NAME OF MORTGAGOR (full caps)
Find all details of CEO at Companies House search
============================

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE

DATE

NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT


 Dear ROBIN HOODY,
 Re: Mortgage Bandits Account Number ################

Pursuant to the clearly expressed terms of your company’s dishonour of NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL
ACCEPTANCE
dated XX  XXXXXXXX 2020, NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated xxx  xxxxxxxxx 20xx and the NOTICE OF DISHONOUR dated xx  xxxxxxxxx  20xx, I hereby serve NOTICE OF LIEN INTEREST.

 For the avoidance of doubt, STRAWMAN intends to file a commercial injury claim against ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED, currently valued at GBP£ (Whatever figure is full demanded mortgage plus all interest and/or repayments made and costs)(THE  TOTAL GREAT BRITISH  POUNDS STERLING GBP  - GOES HERE IN WORDS i.e. amount followed by GREAT BRITISH etc).

The LIEN DEBTOR has seven (7) days from service of this notice to raise any issues, disputes or counterclaims pertaining to this matter.

With sincerity and honour,

[Wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted 
=============================

Following non receipt or inadequate response (meaning ALL questions not answered fully) the affidavit  goes out:
=============================

Affidavit of Obligation
Commercial Lien
A Verified Plain Statement of Fact

The Parties
Claimant:
Upper-case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
MAILING LOCATION
Hereinafter known as “Lien Claimant”

Respondent:
Robin Hoody (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED
MAILING LOCATION
Hereinafter known as “Lien Debtor”

**The Laws of Commerce**

All are equal under the law. See Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: No one is above the law; Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.

In commerce, truth is sovereign. See Exodus 20:16; Psalms 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8. Legal maxim: To lie is to go against the mind.

Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. See Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12.

An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. See 1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: He, who does not deny, admits.

An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce. See Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in court, tribunal or arbitration forum consists of a contest of commercial affidavits, wherein the points remaining unrebutted at the end of the contest stand as the truth to which the judgment of the law is applied.

He who leaves the field of battle first (does not respond appropriately to an Affidavit) loses by default. See Book of Job; Matt 10:22. Legal maxim: He who does not repel a wrong when he can occasions it.

Sacrifice is the measure of credibility. One who is not damaged, put at risk or willing to swear an oath or make an affirmation on his full commercial liability for the truth of his statements and the legitimacy of his actions, has no basis to assert claims or charges, and forfeits all credibility and right to claim the authority to do so. See Acts 7. Legal maxim: He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.

A lien or claim, under commercial law, can only be satisfied by one of the following actions: A full rebuttal by an Affidavit of Truth, point-by-point, supported by evidence and sworn or affirmed at the same level of commercial risk; the satisfaction of the claimant, whether by payment or mutual agreement; resolution by a jury, in accordance with the rules of common law. See Gen. 2-3; Matt 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved

A party injured by the fraud of another may claim triple damages, plus the principal. “And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord: Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor, and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.” Luke 19:8.

**Bouvier’s Maxims**

 Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. 2 Co. Inst. 252. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth. See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061.

Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est. A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null. Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4.

Culpa lata aequiparatur dolo. A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies. Dig. 22, 3, 2; Tait on Ev. 1; 1 Phil. Ev. 194; 1 Greenl. Ev. Sec. 74; 3 Louis. R. 83; 2 Dan. Pr. 408; 4 Bouv Inst. n. 4411.

Error qui non resistitur, approbatur. An error not resisted is approved. Doct. & Stud. c. 70.

Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom’s Max. 349.

Ex facto jus oritur. Law arises out of fact; that is, its application must be to facts.

Ex tota materia emergat resolutio. The construction or resolution should arise out of the whole subject matter.

Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.

Fraus latet in generalibus. Fraud lies hid in general expressions.

Idem est facere, et nolle prohibere cum possis. It is the same thing to do a thing as not to prohibit it when in your power. 3 Co. Inst. 178.

Incerta pro nullius habentur. Things uncertain are held for nothing. Dav. 33.

Incerta quantitas vitiat acium. An uncertain quantity vitiates the act. 1 Roll. R.

Invito beneficium non datur. No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. Dig. 50, 17, 69. But if he does not dissent he will be considered as assenting. Vide Assent.

Judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitur. The judge is condemned when the guilty are acquitted.

Judicium non suo judice datum nullius est momenti. A judgment given by an improper judge is of no moment. 11 Co. 76.

Manga negligentia culpa est, magna culpa dolus est. Gross negligence is a fault, gross fault is a fraud. Dig 50, 16, 226.

Magna culpa dolus est. Great neglect is equivalent to fraud. Dig. 50, 16, 226; 2 Spears, R. 256; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 646.

Peccatum peccato addit qui culpae quam facit patrocinium defensionis adjungit. He adds one offence to another, who, when he commits a crime, joins to it the protection of a defence. 5 Co. 49.

Quando do una et eadem re, duo onerabiles existunt, unus, pro insufficientia alterius, de integro onerabitur. When two persons are liable on a joint obligation, if one makes default the other must bear the whole. 2 Co. Inst. 277.

Qui non libere veritatem pronunciat, proditor est verilatis. He, who does not willingly speak the truth, is a betrayer of the truth.

Qui non obstat quod obstare potest facere videtur. He who does not prevent what he can seems to commit the thing. 2 Co. Inst. 146.

Qui non prohibit quod prohibere potest assentire videtur. He, who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent. 2 Inst. 305.

Qui non propulsat injuriam quando potest, infert. He, who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it. Jenk. Cent. 271.

Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

Reprobata pecunia liberat solventum. Money refused liberates the debtor. 9 Co. 79.

FRAUD ACT 2006
1 Fraud
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed on subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).

(2) The sections are –
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).

Private & International Law UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS

Article 3.8 – Fraud

A party may avoid the contract when it has been led to conclude the contract by the other party’s fraudulent representation, including language, practices, or fraudulent nondisclosure of circumstances which, according to reasonable standards of fair dealing, the latter party should have disclosed.

Article 5.1.3 – Cooperation between the parties

Each party shall cooperate with the other party when such co-operation may reasonably be expected for the performance of that party’s obligations.

Article 7.3.4 – Adequate Assurance of Due Performance

A party who reasonably believes that there will be a fundamental non-performance by the other party may meanwhile withhold its performance. Where this assurance is not provided within a reasonable time the party demanding it may terminate the contract.

Article 7.4.1 – Right to damages

Any non-performance gives the aggrieved party a right to damages either exclusively or in conjunction with any other remedies except where the non-performance is excused under these principles.

Article 7.4.2 – Full compensation

(1) The aggrieved party is entitled to full compensation for harm sustained as a result of the non-performance. Such harm includes both any loss which it suffered and any gain of which it was deprived, taking into account any gain to the aggrieved party resulting from its avoidance of cost or harm
(2) Such harm may be nonpecuniary and includes, for instance, physical suffering and emotional distress.

Allegations:

The following allegations arise from the conduct of Lien Debtor & the Agents of, indirectly and/or directly, in relation to an alleged agreement between the parties, having regard to ACCOUNT NUMBER ****************.

1. There is no evidence to suggest that a legally enforceable original agreement is in existence between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

2. There is no evidence to suggest that the allegedly outstanding balance AMOUNT ALLEGEDLY OWED on the above referenced account can be verified by Lien Debtor, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

3. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor’s valuable consideration pertaining to the alleged debt can be validated upon reasonable request by Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

4. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor is not in multiple breaches of the Office of Fair Trading’s Final Guidance on Unfair Business Practices (updated December 2006).

5. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor, by its dishonour of Lien Claimant’s NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated _______________________ , as well as OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated ________________________ and NOTICE OF DISHONOUR dated  ----------------------------respectively,  is not concealing material facts pertaining to any existing and legally enforceable agreement between the parties, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

6. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor lent its own money as adequate consideration to purchase the note (loan agreement) from Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

7. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant did not provide valuable consideration to fund the alleged loan(s) from Lien Debtor, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

8. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor did not accept an item of value from Lien Claimant that was used to give value to a cheque, electronic transfer or similar instrument, of approximately the same value of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

9. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP (the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of the United Kingdom) in the execution of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

10. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor’s chartered accountant and auditor at the time of the alleged loan(s) can confirm that Lien Debtor followed UK GAAP in the execution of the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

11. There is no evidence to suggest that the intent of the alleged loan agreement is that the party who funded the loan(s) is not the party that is to be repaid the money, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

12. There is no evidence to suggest that all the material facts of the alleged loan(s) agreement have been disclosed to Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

13. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant was obliged to lend the note to Lien Debtor or another financial institution, in order to fund the alleged loan(s), and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

14. There is no evidence to suggest that the original agreement (purported mortgage note) has not been sold, altered or stolen, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

15. There is no evidence to suggest that the alleged borrower (Lien Claimant) did not provide the funds that the alleged lender (Lien Debtor) claims it lent to Lien Claimant, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

16. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Debtor does not owe Lien Claimant a sum of money treble the value of Lien Debtor’s invalid claim, plus the alleged amount outstanding, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

17. There is no evidence to suggest that Lien Claimant has not already procured the tacit agreement of Lien Debtor that all of the allegations set forth in this Affidavit are factually correct, true and complete, and Lien Claimant believes that no such evidence exists.

LEDGERING
For the avoidance of doubt, this document is a security interest expressing the value of Lien Claimant’s natural, equitable and legal rights over all the property, income and assets of Lien Debtor, to the value expressed within. Lien Claimant hereby charges this instrument in the sum of [total losses, plus costs] TOTAL LIEN VALUE: GBP £#,###,###.00, subject to additional default charges.

DEFAULT CONDITIONS

Lien Debtor is given 21 days to deliver to Lien Claimant material evidence in support of an appropriate point-for-point rebuttal under oath or affirmation of the foregoing allegations. Failure to repudiate or rebut with material evidence every allegation made will result in Lien Debtor becoming immediately liable for the payment of [total losses, plus costs]. Triple Damages of [total losses, plus costs x3] will also be added to the debt if Lien Debtor’s default is not cured. In the event that it is not cured within 90 days, Lien Debtor becomes liable for Exemplary Damages of [total losses, plus costs x 100] following NOTICE OF DEFAULT.

AFFIRMATION

I, Upper-Case: Lower,
Authorised Representative for NAME OF PURPORTED MORTGAGOR (Lien Claimant), hereby affirm upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that I have read all of the contents of this Affidavit of Obligation, and to the very best of my knowledge, I believe that the facts expressed herein are true, correct and complete.


__________________[Wet signature here]
Executed by:
Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse – Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

VERIFICATION
[Please note this verification part is where you find a Notary Public willing to witness attest your name and sworn affirmation. If that is not possible to find such a Notary, it is acceptable as a last resort, to have three(3) independent witnesses to supply Full Name, Address, signature and date. See below the example for that and always remember to delete all 'in red' instructions from document!)
Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________,
on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.
Notary Public: Notary Seal: Notary Public’s office location.

Signed & Sealed By: __________________________________________

[Witness layout template]:
Name of Witness 1: 
Address of Witness 1:

Signature of Witness 1:
Date:

Name of Witness 2:
Address of Witness 2:

Signature of Witness 2:
Date:


Name of Witness 3:
Address of Witness 3:

Signature of Witness 3:
Date:

NOTICE is hereby given that the Lien Debtor has twenty one (21) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the allegations contained herein. Failure to rebut, deny or otherwise disprove any of the allegations will be construed as Lien Debtors’ affirmation that said allegations have been proven to be true, correct and complete. Void where prohibited by law. 
=============================

If they then have refused or simply not replied with full answers to your questions - this then goes out

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE

COMPANY NUMBER

LICENSE NUMBER [If you have it]

DATE

NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear Robin Hoody,

Your company has failed to respond to to the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.

Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE.

ROBIN HOODY has twenty one (21) days in which to deliver an appropriate and timely response.
Triple damages now apply.

With sincerity and honour,
[Wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted 

======================================

When this is not responded to or does not comply with original requests then
the next and final letter goes out: This is then followed by a final Affidavit of Service and Non Response


PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
ROBIN HOODY (CEO)
ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (DEBTOR)
REGISTERED OFFICE

COMPANY NUMBER

LICENSE NUMBER [If you have it]

DATE

NOTICE OF DEFAULT
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear Robin Hoody,

Your company has failed to respond to the notarised AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________, as well as NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE dated _______________________, and served by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery ############### on ______________________.

Therefore, I hereby serve NOTICE OF DEFAULT. Exemplary damages now apply.

With sincerity and honour,

[Wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case: Lower
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN
All Rights Reserved – Without Prejudice – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted

It is then perfectly acceptable to then send the final 

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
This document summarises all the documentation/paper trail
that has been exchange with the other party. It is a verified plain statement of facts.

=====================
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
A Verified Plain Statement of the Facts

I, Upper-Case: Lower, an adult flesh and blood man of sound mind, do state unequivocally that I served the following documents on ROBIN HOODY, CEO of ROBIN HOODIES LIMITED (Respondent), by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery:

1. NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
2. NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
3. NOTICE OF DISHONOUR DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
4. NOTICE OF LIEN INTEREST DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
5. AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
6. NOTICE OF FAULT & OPPORTUNITY TO CURE DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################;
7. NOTICE OF DEFAULT DATED ______________________, ROYAL MAIL RECORDED DELIVERY #################.

The Respondent has subsequently failed to deliver appropriate and timely responses to any of the documents listed above.

AFFIRMATION

I hereby affirm and declare upon my own unlimited commercial liability and under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true, complete and correct, and not misleading.

[Wet signature here]

By: Upper-Case: Lower ________________________________
Authorised Representative for STRAWMAN (Lien Claimant)
All Rights Reserved – Without Recourse
Non-Assumpsit Errors & Omissions Excepted

VERIFICATION
[As previously please note this verification part is where you find a Notary Public willing to witness attest your name and sworn affirmation. If that is not possible to find such a Notary, it is acceptable to have three(3) independent witnesses to supply Full Name, Address, signature and date. See below the example for that and always remember to delete all 'in red' instructions from document!)
Affirmed, autographed and sealed before me, _________________,
on the _______ day of the month of ________, in the year two thousand and ______.


NAME & ADDRESS OF NOTARY PUBLIC Seal:
Signed: _______________________________

[Witness layout template]:
Name of Witness 1:
Address of Witness 1:

Signature of Witness 1:
Date:

Name of Witness 2:
Address of Witness 2:

Signature of Witness 2:
Date:


Name of Witness 3:
Address of Witness 3:

Signature of Witness 3:
Date:

 NOTICE is hereby given that the Respondent has three (3) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Service to
rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the statement of the facts contained herein.
Failure to deliver an appropriate response within the stated time will comprise the tacit procuration of the Respondent’s
agreement that the contents of this Affidavit are true, correct and complete, and not misleading.


That is it - you are now mortgage free! After the 90 days have passed from the receipt by the other party (signed Royal Mail delivered track and trace) of the Affidavit of Obligation you will have in your possession a Commercial Lien financial instrument for the final amount.



Documentation

To use as stated

Knowing your rights is an important part of your life, especially when they are trying to take them away from us. Here are some simple yet important facts to guide you. They will be added to, of course - Lawful Resistance

This UK-centric Commercial Lien process is not for the faint-hearted or those looking for a quick-fix.
 If you are not in default on a mortgage but have gleaned sufficient knowledge to know that you have been duped, conned and/or misled, then you might consider taking the following course of action against your mortgage bandit, whose entire modus operandi is to get you into default as quickly as possible, in order to take your home by using various statutes as a cloak for fraud.
Please watch The Great British Mortgage Swindle documentary as this will give you an excellent background to the process you are about to launch into

In the event you have already done some sort of discovery process, which asked similar questions to the first three discovery missives here , you can start at NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST, in which case you will need to delete the documents you don’t send from the list in the final AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE & NON-RESPONSE
The first three discovery letters start here:

For those courageous enough to move forward, this site was created. It is not alone in offering content, knowledge and assistance to the self change and educational process, yet it is in total co-operation with all who are of like mind and endeavour. 

The Freedom Cycle

Security of Interest and Affidavit of Obligation

Where to Start

The Journey starts here. If you have more information that would be helpful please get in contact

Share This Page!

Dreams and Realities A book for our time

01

Jonathan Trapman

Jonathan L Trapman is an author, creative writer and photojournalist who has spent the better part of his 45 odd years in public life, learning from his personal experiences, sharing them, listening to others, whose lives have allowed him to open his own mind to a beauty, even within horror, that is transforming and empowering. His written work endeavors to convey, through true tales and fiction, impressions thus garnered. Dreams and Realities can be purchased (signed by the author if wanted) here.

The Freedom Cycle

© 2021 The Freedom Cycle

Contact

Address: Glastonbury, Somerset UK
Phone: (UK)
+44 (0)1225 29 2333
Phone: (US)
+1 864-372-4820
[email protected]

Social