The crimes this tyrannical regime have perpetrated on the People of Britain, these Isles of the Sovereign Free will be met by the might and just force of the Common Law



Whitelist us
[email protected]
so you receive your emails
We are being attacked so you do not
Easy workaround HERE


Taking the illegal government down is not a straight line but we will always feed you latest here so go check, even if there is no update!

Freedom Cell   |  The PUB            


Join Your Freedom Cell

For The Great Reveal.
details here


Come into the PUB Peoples Union of Britain

The Union where we The People lay down our Rights
One Issue - The Common Law as THE Law -All Here

Exposing the Criminality!

Game On, Not Game Off!

Brilliant Dissection of  Attempted Sabotage of Case


Prof Dolores Cahill exposes the grim truths behind these lockdowns and criminal impositions. As part of the Worldwide Doctors Alliance and association with PUB she promotes a free Britain that integrally includes Ireland.

This slam dunks much of the lurgy lies spouted by our totalitarian state masters

Prosecution of British MPs Update

As Parliament approves Boris Johnson’s proposal to put England back into full lockdown for a month, on the eve of 5th November, Michael O’Bernicia returns with the latest news on the Private Criminal Prosecutions that he and his legal team are bringing via the Common Law system. There is a chance, he says, that all MPs who voted for the extension will find themselves under House Arrest on charges of Fraud, Treason and Genocide.

The Phantom in the Covid Opera

Gemma O'Doherty, Investigative Journalist in Ireland. This Irish Investigation into Covid shows that The Department of health refuse to confirm existence of a “virus” in writing.Confirmation that the virus was never isolated. On top of this, the CDC in July revealed that there is no Covid-19 in a document titled "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic panel", dated July 13, 2020. 
So, what are people dying of? Well... The same thing they die of every year!

The Coronavirus Agenda - What The Maintain Media Don't Want You To Know 

27 April 2020 Unmasking The Lies Around Covid-19: Facts vs Fiction of The Coronavirus Pandemic Interview with London Real's Brian Rose

Share This Page!

Major Update News

All major recent updates are here

COVID-1984 UPDATE 22-06-21

PUB To Appeal After PCP Judge Dismisses Expert Testimony As 'Hearsay'

Last Wednesday afternoon, we received an order from the judge in PUB's Private Criminal Prosecution against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson for pandemic fraud, dismissing the case without a hearing, on the ludicrous ground that there is no evidence the defendants have acted dishonestly, whether for material gains or with prior knowledge that their actions would cause catastrophic loss. In doing so, the judge also set aside comprehensive expert witness testimony as mere "hearsay", without offering any explanation as to why he came to such an arrogant and myopic conclusion about the findings of people who know far more about the subject matter than he could rightfully claim to know himself.

However, according to Bouvier's Law Dictionary [infinitely more reliable than Black's], hearsay evidence is exactly what the UK Government's COVID-19 policies [and the decision of the judge] are based upon:

The evidence of those who relate, not what they know themselves, but what they have heard from others.

2. As a general rule, hearsay evidence of a fact is not admissible. If any fact is to be substantiated against a person, it ought to be proved in his presence by the testimony of a witness sworn or affirmed to speak the truth.

3. There are, however, exceptions to the rule. 1. Hearsay is admissible when it is introduced, not as a medium of proof in order to establish a distinct fact, but as being in itself a part of the transaction in question, when it is a part of the res gestae. 1 Phil. Ev. 218; 4 Wash. C. C. R. 729; 14 Serg. & Rawle, 275; 21 How. St. Tr. 535; 6 East, 193.

Furthermore, this definition also reveals that the expert witness testimony we adduced is incapable of being considered hearsay, on the basis that none of it contains anything other than that which relates to things they know themselves, rather than what they have heard from others.

Were it not for conflicting signs which preceded his decision, when it appeared the Deputy Chief Magistrate was acting like he possessed enough integrity to allow the case to proceed, this would just be more of what we have already learned to expect from the rigged just-us system, whilst fighting mortgage fraud in the courts over more than a decade.

Nonetheless, whether he was nobbled, lost his bottle or he is just another criminal in ermine, here is a summary of the DCM's unsustainable decision, which will form the foundations of our imminent appeal to the High Court.

Justice Miscarried

Whilst the judge appears to faintly recognise the possibility of dishonesty in both the false statements and the non-disclosures relied upon by the defendants, he fails to recognise the evidence supporting the allegations as anything more than hearsay or opinion, despite the expert witness credentials of three doctors, two professors, a dental surgeon, a mathematician, a probate solicitor, a retired senior nuclear submarine data analyst, an independent data analyst and an ex CID fraud detective.

He also doesn't seem to understand that the Fraud Act 2006 is incorporated into and a reflection of the Common Law, as he insists it a only a statutory offence, when the Fraud Act is unequivocally the Common Law of Fraud codified in a statute, as Bouvier's affirms:

FRAUD, contracts, torts. Any trick or artifice employed by one person to induce another to fall into an error, or to detain him in it, so that he may make an agreement contrary to his interest. The fraud may consist either, first, in the misrepresentation, or, secondly, in the concealment of a material fact. Fraud, force and vexation, are odious in law.

Moreover, it is well established that the absence of a definition of fraud in the 2006 Act resulted in the courts continuing to rely upon the Common Law definition of fraud in criminal cases, as they did before it was enacted by Parliament, which Anand Doobay, Partner in the Fraud and Regulatory Department, Peters & Peters Solicitors, affirmed in an overview of the Act, shortly after it came into force and effect:

"10. Section 1 introduces the offence of fraud which can be committed in three circumstances that are, in the Act's own terms, where a person is in breach of sections 2 to 4. However, no statutory definition of fraud is provided leaving the Act open to criticism on the grounds of generality, open-endedness and potential criminalisation of trivial disputes. It is too early to tell how far prosecutorial discretion can address these criticisms."

If the DCM doesn't know that the 2006 Act derives from the Common Law of Fraud [misrepresentation and non-disclosure], how does that reflect on his ability to discern whether all of the elements of fraud are in place in the PCP? Not very well, is the best that can be said.

Prima Facie Evidence Ignored

Essentially, the judge is arguing that there is no prima facie evidence that the Four Horsemen intended to make material gains [even if they relied on dishonest statements which serviced the agenda to maximise 'vaccination' uptake], when he should know very well that such gains are often received long in advance of frauds being committed or by an accomplice in the aftermath, which we have abundant evidence of in this case.

He also elected to ignore the critically important fact that Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson were all directly involved in the 2014-16 Ebola scamdemic. Indeed, Whitty and Ferguson dictated almost identical lockdown policies to the government of Sierra Leone, whilst Vallance spearheaded GSK's development of an Ebola 'vaccine', which was promptly heralded as the only route out of the West African lockdown.

In the above-linked article, written by Whitty and six other authors, including Ferguson, in Nature Magazine, on 06/11/2014, they wrote of the situation in Sierra Leone:

"One proposed strategy — giving families information and basic personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimise transmission while nursing patients at home — is problematic. Using PPE safely is difficult even for professionals, as infection rates in health-care workers demonstrate. And identifying cases and training families requires staff that Sierra Leone does not have. This approach is acceptable only as a desperate humanitarian measure when there is no space available in health facilities. It is not a good strategy to reduce transmission. [...]

We hope that in the coming months, safe and effective vaccines will be produced at large enough volumes to stop this outbreak, but thousands are dying now. Qualitative, quantitative and clinical sciences, and the ability to adapt and learn from mistakes, are urgently needed to reduce community transmission."

Simply put, this is prima facie evidence that Whitty and Ferguson were promoting GSK's Ebola 'vaccine' the month before it was fast-tracked into production by Vallance, from which it is reasonable to deduce that they were at least collaborating five years before the latter left GSK for the second most senior scientific position in the UK Government in 2018. But not before forming an on-going partnership between GSK and the Gates Foundation, which continues to this day.

It also proves that they knew PPE "is not a good strategy to reduce transmission", yet they imposed mandatory masks, hand sanitizers and isolation gowns upon the British people - acts which benefited nobody except the companies to which Hancock awarded the government contracts, including corporate entities owned by the Secretary of State's friends and family.

Gates Connections

Meanwhile, Ferguson became the head of Gates-funded WHO's Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Modelling in April 2019, since when he has been responsible for predicting pandemics and devising the government policies the WHO recommends worldwide.

Having spent most of his professional career at Imperial College, in a department which is almost entirely funded by the Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, the other primary business partner of GSK, it is no surprise that Ferguson recommended to the UK Government in his infamous Imperial College Model [also funded by Gates] that the only way out of lockdowns is to maximize 'vaccination' uptake, in the summary of the Imperial College Model:

"In the absence of a COVID-19 vaccine, we assess the potential role of a number of public health measures – so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) – aimed at reducing contact rates in the population and thereby reducing transmission of the virus. [...]

The major challenge of suppression is that this type of intensive intervention package – or something equivalently effective at reducing transmission – will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available (potentially 18 months or more) – given that we predict that transmission will quickly rebound if interventions are relaxed."

Just as Whitty did to the Sierra Leone Government, having received £31 million from the Gates Foundation in 2012, when he was Professor of Public and International Health at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and Principal Investigator of the ACT Consortium, for the purposes of research and development of Malaria 'vaccines', about which he said at the time:

“We are delighted. There have been great strides forward in developing new drugs. We now have to start to get them to the people who need them. The funding by the Gates Foundation to these studies on four continents, but concentrating on Africa, will help determine how best to achieve this.”

Around seven years later, on January 01 2020, not long after he was appointed as the UK Government's Chief Medical Officer and following the integral role he played in the formation of the Gates-funded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation [CEPI] in 2017-18, Whitty was appointed to the Gates-funded WHO's Executive Board, the month after the board formally recommended to governments that the maximisation of 'vaccination' uptake worldwide should be made a matter of public policy.

Demonstrable Material Gains For Big Pharma

In January 2019, Hancock met with Gates in a ministerial meeting, three weeks after he met with the leaders of the World Economic Forum. The meetings are still subject to FOI requests, but it is recorded on the government's website that Hancock discussed health technology with the WEF and 'anti-microbial resistance and research' with Gates.

Hancock has, of course, gone on to tirelessly promote the notion that maximising 'vaccination' uptake is the only way out of lockdowns, just as Gates has stated in innumerable television interviews since the start of COVID-1984, as per the agenda of Gates-funded GAVI, into which the UK Government invested £330 million a year for five years, in April 2020.

Ministerial records also show that Hancock held multiple meetings with GSK, the Wellcome Trust and just about every other Big Pharma player in the UK during 2019, many of whom have already procured significant material gains from the UK Government's subsequent COVID-19 'vaccine' contracts with GSK-Sanofi, Oxford-AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna, as well as the manufacturers' indemnification against potential damages claims.

Whether the defendants knowingly relied upon the false statements in the Imperial College Model for their own material gain, or those of other parties, is irrelevant for the purposes of proving fraud by false representation and it is an unequivocal fact that UK Government COVID-19 policies that they recommended have provided PPE companies and Big Pharma's primary stakeholders with significant financial gains from government contracts.

Which naturally comprises prima facie evidence that the frauds alleged were perpetrated to maximise PPE and 'vaccination' uptake, which walks hand in hand with maximising Big Pharma profits but in material breach of section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006.

Prior Knowledge of Inevitable Catastrophic Consequences

The year before Sierra Leone locked down on the 'advice' of Whitty and Ferguson, the country's GDP grew by more than 20% to $5 billion. However, Sierra Leone's GDP dropped from $5 billion to $3.67 billion from 2014-2016, as a direct result of adopting the pandemic policies recommended, which we now know as the recommendations of Ferguson's plainly fraudulent Imperial College Model - the entire basis for WHO and UK Government COVID-19 policy.

It is therefore beyond reasonable doubt that Whitty and Ferguson knew from their wrongdoings in Sierra Leone that the UK economy would contract, as it did by 11.3% in 2020, according to official government data, as a result of their lockdown policies being imposed upon Britain.

That constitutes having prior knowledge that the consequences of those policies would cause significant losses to the UK economy, which created the legal obligation to disclose to the British people the catastrophic financial cost of locking down Sierra Leone, which the defendants never did, in material breach of section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006.

As far as proving that Vallance has known about the likelihood of potentially fatal adverse reactions to the 'vaccines' he has brought to the world, one needs to look no further than this PDF, which was released by the British Medical Journal after the BMJ's editor gained access to GSK's pharmacovigilance report, relating to the 2009 H1N1 scamdemic.

The GSK document states that the Pandemrix influenza 'vaccine' safety study showed that three out of every million 'vaccinated' were likely to die within 28 days of being injected with it, whilst 75.9 out of every million would suffer serious adverse reactions to an emergency chemical treatment, developed with Vallance's direct involvement and approval.

It therefore cannot be seriously argued that Vallance had no knowledge that the flu and COVID jabs he has tirelessly promoted have the potential to kill and seriously harm those who are injected, or that he has not personally profited from the government's deal to bulk-buy 60 million doses of the experimental GSK-Sanofi COVID 'vaccine', given that he left the company with £600,000 worth of shares.

Since Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson comprise the three most senior advisors to the UK Government on 'COVID-19 pandemic' policy, we can naturally presume that Hancock was briefed as to the effects of lockdowns, before he presented the bill which enabled them [the Coronavirus Act 2020] to Parliament.

We can also safely assume that Vallance briefed Hancock, Whitty and Ferguson about his prior knowledge of the potentially fatal adverse events of the 'vaccine' roll-outs, which expert witness testimony from a former GSK scientist alleges he was fully aware of whilst president of the company.

Hence, the necessity for the government to indemnify everybody who develops, manufactures, distributes and administers the COVID jabs from potential damages claims and to suspend autopsies on all suspected 'COVID-19 deaths', by way of section 30 of the 2020 Act.

Gaping Hole

Therefore, the most gaping hole in the DCM's argument is that he alleges that even if the Four Horsemen lied and failed to disclose for the purposes of fuelling the vaxx agenda, there is no proof they did it for material gain or knowing that significant losses would be incurred, which Vallance's shares in GSK, Whitty and Ferguson's money from Gates and the Wellcome Trust and the UK Government's massive investments in the WHO, CEPI and GAVI, as well as Whitty and Ferguson's prime roles in the locking down of Sierra Leone, blow wide open.

Furthermore, if, as he claims in his order, he does not have the jurisdiction to declare that 'vaccination' must cease under the Precautionary Principle to prevent potential injury or death, or that autopsies must be carried out to give finality to the families of the dead, then the second highest ranking District Judge in the country does not have the authority to prevent further casualties of murderous government policy.

In other words, he is really telling us that the judiciary is not authorised to allow the People to prosecute government officers in the courts and HM Constabulary won't investigate their crimes because we already live in an authoritarian police state, under Big Pharma's unaccountable Bolshevik dictatorship, otherwise known as the Rothschild Cartel's Cabinet Office.

War of Attrition

Given the circumstances, we must look at appealing this decision as a powerful symbol of resistance, in what is now going to be another bitter war of attrition, in which we will have the majority of the country on our side once they know the truth about the evidence of government crimes that is being suppressed, supposedly 'for the greater good'.

In the meantime, how's this for "hearsay", taken directly from the Deputy Chief Magistrate's void order:

"I am also satisfied that this application is intended as a means of reviewing the appropriateness of the government response to the ‘COVID virus’. I find that an attempt to bring a private prosecution, in any event, amounts to an improper purpose."

Oh yeah? Where's the prima facie evidence of that then?!? There isn't any! So who is the one with an improper purpose, Mr Deputy Chief Magistrate? Because it certainly isn't the prosecution in PUB v Hancock & Others, as will be emphatically demonstrated by a forthcoming series of posts on this blog, which will document the compelling prima facie evidence he dismissed as "hearsay", as we launch the appeal of his highly unsafe decision in the High Court.

Resolutely Undaunted

However, as I have maintained from the start of these proceedings, having fought and overturned multiple miscarriages of justice in my family's High Court case against Bank of Scotland, which resulted in the bank giving up its fraudulent claim for £2.5 million after nine years of fighting to enforce it, I was fully prepared for such an eventuality in the PCP before it transpired, as was the former CID detective I am working with on the case.

We will therefore continue in our unrelenting fight for justice, in a system rigged to protect our adversaries from the consequences of their crimes, resolutely undaunted by yet another unjust decision by a member of the judiciary.

Nonetheless, in a tyrannical system of control, justice is never willingly handed down by judges to the people; it will only ever be surrendered when there is no other possible course of action.

So we will continue our battle for the case to be heard by a jury in a court of competent jurisdiction, before which the DCM's order must be set aside, in an appeal which is already being prepared and will be filed at the earliest opportunity.

Even if our initial application is refused on paper, we will be entitled to ask that the matter be decided at a hearing before a single judge, which would almost certainly take place at the Royal Courts of Justice within the next few weeks.

Same Shit, Different Decade

In the meantime, those of you who want to see for yourselves how we won an all-too-similar war of attrition against BOS and their LPA Receivers can watch The Great British Mortgage Swindle here for free.

Those of you who already have seen the film will already know that we fought miscarriages of justice for the best part of five years, before we won Summary Judgment in the High Court, arguing exactly the same points which had been dismissed as "totally without merit" by four senior judges, all but one of whom took early retirement in the aftermath of their unscrupulous defence of institutionalised mortgage fraud.

Just in case the implicit point I am making is unclear, we won't be letting one or multiple void court orders prevent us from bringing the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984 to justice, no matter how long it takes to hold them to account for their crimes against the People.

Major Update News


COVID-1984 UPDATE 09-06-21

An Integrous Judge & Vallance’s Prior Knowledge of Adverse Events

Shocking new expert witness testimony from a scientist who used to work in a GSK lab, which has been submitted to the prosecution in PUB v Hancock & Others, alleges that Patrick Vallance had prior knowledge that his former company’s ‘vaccines’ cause adverse events in a significant proportion of those injected.

Furthermore, the case’s latest expert witness claims that Vallance knows about the likelihood of severe adverse events occurring after GSK ‘vaccines’ [including up to 50% fatalities, in the case of the Vallance approved ‘vaccine’ against Dysentery, which was widely distributed in West Africa just before the 2014 Ebola scamdemic, for which, of course, GSK had already manufactured a different ‘vaccine’].

However, Vallance’s open suppression and cover-up of the relevant safety studies did not prevent those facts becoming common knowledge at the lab where our whistle-blower worked, which resulted in her resignation shortly afterwards, when Vallance refused to comply with a demand that the manufacture and distribution of the potentially fatal chemical treatments be suspended with immediate effect.

Needless to say, this utterly compelling testimony will be added to the evidence bundle in the PCP and I will elaborate further in a future post.

PCP Update
In response to the voluminous inquiries relating to the Private Criminal Prosecution [PCP] of Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson for multiple counts of pandemic fraud, here is a brief update on the latest state of play.

Patiently awaiting the final decision of the presiding judge, as to whether he issues summonses for the defendants to answer the charges laid at Westminster Magistrates Court, we contacted the court to ascertain what stage the Deputy Chief Magistrate had reached in his deliberations.

Happily, we were deeply encouraged from the warm response we received, within just half an hour of the email of our request for an update.

Ongoing Consideration Upon The Evidence
Having been contacted by our ever-helpful liaison officer between Bromley and Westminster Magistrates Courts, we were informed that the judge requires more time because of the sheer weight of the evidence that is now before him. Naturally, we responded with our sincere gratitude for the speedy update.

Within ten minutes, the judge, who has already demonstrated his integrity by honouring our informal request that he set aside his initial decision to dismiss the action, when all he had before him was the Statement of Case, promptly sent us another message.

Noting that he is incapable of considering electronic evidence contained on a portable hard drive in the evidence files, the judge asked us to provide him with a hard copy of the leaked WHO flu ‘vaccine’ safety study [initially received on a hard drive], upon which we based our calculation of the flu vaxx mortality rate with 98% accuracy last Autumn.

An Integrous Judge in Troubled Times
However, not only does this constitute another example of the integrity of the judge deciding the destiny of the case, given that he could so easily have ignored the absence of the leaked study, arguing that it would not be enough to substantiate the allegations of pandemic fraud; it also comprises a dazzlingly positive indication that he intends to make his mind up upon the evidence alone, without fear or favour.

Therefore, despite the fact that the whole process has already eaten up the better part of the past six months, we have reasons to be cautiously optimistic that the case against the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984 is in the hands of a man who believes in the unalienable right to prosecute wrongdoers under the Common Law, irrespective of political office.

Moreover, the Deputy Chief Magistrate might well go on to prove that we do, at the very least, have one integrous senior judge left in this country, who fully comprehends that justice does not exist in a nation state where government officers cannot be held to account for their crimes against the People in a court of law.

In The Judge’s Shoes
If I were in his shoes, the very fact that somebody separated the Statement of Case from the three evidence files would have already convinced me that some very powerful people feared the result of proper consideration of both the statement and the substantiating documents.

Nevertheless, as Deputy Chief Magistrate, that would render me even more determined to allow the case to proceed, given that the evidence before the court includes witness statements from eleven expert witnesses, all of whom unequivocally corroborate the allegations made in the Statement of Case.

With a fair wind, we will receive his decision within days rather than weeks and proceed from there. Either way, you’ll read about it all here at PUB, so stay tuned for all future updates.


COVID-1984 UPDATE 15-05-21

PCP Set To Be Listed For Hearing At Bromley Magistrates Court!

Having fought numerous miscarriages of justice in the courts over more than a decade, I am well versed in determining when my legal adversaries are engaged in the dark art of sabotage.

From lightweight forms such as pretending they didn’t receive notices which were sent by recorded mail, to conspiring to have me declared bankrupt and subjecting me to an Extended Civil Restraint Order – which effectively banned me from issuing proceedings in every court – the depths to which desperate saboteurs will sink are often bottomless.

Especially when the potential consequences of my arguments being sustained are lengthy prison sentences for members of the privileged class, who genuinely believe they are unaccountable to the people they cheat, exploit and destroy for their own private material gains.

Judicial Sabotage 101
Generally speaking, the critical element of sabotaging a legal case is convincing the judge that either some crucial piece of evidence is missing, or that the arguments submitted are somehow misconceived and therefore ‘totally without merit’.

However, in the so-called superior civil courts, where judges so often consider themselves to be beyond both the law and reproach, I’ve lost count of the number of times I have witnessed high ranking members of the judiciary become aggressive advocates for my opponents, who simply have to turn up at court and spin their unsubstantiated sophistry to go home with the judgment and a hefty costs order in their favour.

Given the ultimate seriousness of laying charges of pandemic fraud against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson and their mistakenly perceived unaccountability as officers of the UK’s criminally rogue government, it was certainly no surprise that myself and the former CID detective I am working with detected the first sign of sabotage, within two weeks of the case being filed.

Hidden In Plain Sight
As I have already documented here, our Statement of Case was filed electronically at Westminster Magistrates Court on 19/03/2021, along with a covering letter informing the court that our substantive evidence bundle would be sent by Royal Mail Special Delivery the following week, including hard copies of the Statement of Case and the covering letter.

On 26/03/2021, the three case files were received and signed for by the court, as is shown by the slideshow at the top of this post. We were then informed by Westminster Magistrates that the papers were being checked by the court’s legal department and that we would be notified of the case’s progression in due course.

After not hearing anything for a couple of weeks, we made further inquiries and were told that the papers had been sent by Westminster to Bromley Magistrates Court’s listing department for processing and that they were undergoing final check’s by the Kent court’s legal department.

Moreover, we were told the files had been sent to Bromley because that is the judicial venue to which all Private Criminal Prosecutions filed at Westminster are sent for processing and listing, once the latter court’s legal team have completed their initial assessment of the papers laid.

Deputy Chief Magistrate
However, a few days later we received an email from the Westminster Court, letting us know that the case had been passed to the Deputy Chief Magistrate [DCM] for consideration and his decision was enclosed as an attachment.

Despite what we had been told about the three evidence files being processed by the Bromley court’s legal team and listings department, the judge purported to dismiss the case on the emphatically unsustainable ground that we haven’t cited enough prima facie evidence for the case to proceed.

Nevertheless, the DCM stated in his judgment that he had given very careful consideration to “126 pages” of evidence, when the final page count in the three case files was in excess of 800 pages [condensed from more than 1,000 pages], which included 11 expert witness statements in support of the serious allegations made.

It was then that we realised that the judge’s decision was based entirely on the 126 page Statement of Case and that he clearly hadn’t had sight of the copious prima facie evidence contained in the three evidence files.

As Void As The Dodo
Whilst the judge clearly believed that, in the absence of the corroborating expert witness statements, there was not enough evidence for the case to proceed, his decision to dismiss it was as void as the Dodo, albeit seemingly through no fault of his own.

Needless to say, we called Bromley Magistrates to check whether they knew anything about the decision having been made and were somewhat surprised to discover that the court’s legal team had sent the case [including the three evidence files] to the DCM for consideration and that we should receive his decision in due course.

Naturally, we gave those concerned the benefit of the doubt and provisionally assumed that the legal teams of both courts realised that an obvious error had been made and that the initial decision would be disregarded.

However, a few days later we received an email from Bromley letting us know that the judge had already decided the matter and dismissed the case in the order we had already received from Westminster.

We therefore logically concluded that there had been a very subtle attempt to sabotage the case by separating the electronic filing of the Statement of Case from the hard copy evidence files which arrived by Special Delivery the following week.

Reconsideration Trumps Sabotage
Without delay, upon our polite request, Westminster Magistrates was informed by our liaison at Bromley Magistrates that, through what appeared to be no fault of his own, the DCM’s decision was void, on the ground that it was merely based upon the Statement of Case and did not take into account the prima facie evidence adduced.

But rather than appealing the decision to the High Court on that ground, we suggested that it would be better for all concerned if the judge was willing to set aside his initial decision, despite the fact that we have never known any judge in either the criminal and civil domains to even countenance such an action once a decision has been made.

Nevertheless, within a little more than 24 hours, we were informed that the Deputy Chief Magistrate had decided to grant our request for reconsideration, as if the order dismissing the case had not been made.

Furthermore, the judge indicated that he will be reconsidering the case upon all the evidence adduced at the end of next week, with his final decision to follow shortly afterwards.

As Rare As Hen’s Teeth
In other words, the DCM appears to have shown that he possesses that increasingly rare quality among the judiciary – integrity – given that he could so easily have passed the buck to a dodgy High Court judge by forcing us to appeal his void decision in a rigged proceeding, instead of admitting the error and reconsidering the case on its merits. It certainly wouldn’t have been the first time we experienced such blatant judicial corruption.

Moreover, even if he committed the error of judgment because of foul play by a government stooge working at Westminster Magistrates Court, the judge’s integrous reconsideration of the case emphatically trumps the duplicitous attempt to sabotage it.

However, rest assured that no matter what the outcome of the judge’s second decision, we have no intention of backing down until the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984 and their accomplices are held to account for their crimes, for the purposes of which we are fully prepared to challenge any miscarriage of justice we are handed in the interim, as the foregoing account unequivocally affirms.


COVID-1984 UPDATE 25-04-21

PCP Set To Be Listed For Hearing At Bromley Magistrates Court!

If you missed the last update, please read here before you continue reading this post, so that you are up to speed with all the latest developments in the case, which has now progressed from Westminster to Bromley Magistrates Court.

One week ago, we were informed by telephone that PUB’s PCP papers are now with the designated court’s listings department, who expect a case number will soon be issued, following checks by the legal team at Bromley Magistrates, to which it was transferred for processing and listing by the Westminster court where the case was laid last month.

Effectively, this means that the case files contained enough prima facie evidence of pandemic fraud for Westminster to transfer the case to Bromley, for the purposes of performing the final legal checks [the initial checks having been done by the south London court’s legal department] and listing the first hearing of the case at the Kent court.

Past Experience & Mansfield’s PCP
Experience has taught us, by way of the Hancock warrant application being dismissed at the end of 2020 [in the absence of enough prima facie evidence], upon the order of a district judge at Westminster Magistrates Court, who made his decision on paper [without a hearing], that we have already cleared the first major hurdle in the proceedings.

Moreover, were that not correct there is no realistic possibility that the case would have been transferred to Bromley’s listing department, especially given that particular judicial venue is where all PCP’s laid at Westminster are sent when sufficient evidence has been submitted to justify the listing of a hearing at Bromley Magistrates Court, which specialises in Private Criminal Prosecutions.

Furthermore, when renegade barrister, Michael Mansfield QC, acted for a retired Iraqi general in a PCP against former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and others, for crimes of aggression in Iraq, the papers were laid at Westminster Magistrates, where they were dismissed on the grounds that the accused are immune from prosecution and the offence is unknown to UK law.

Nevertheless, Mansfield ran a High Court appeal of the decision, on the ground that the evidence cited against the defendants was sufficient for the case to proceed to trial. However, the court refused the appeal and upheld the ground that the UK does not recognise the crime of aggression under domestic law as being an indictable offence.

R [Rabbat] v Blair & Others
In corroboration of the foregoing, on 05/07/2017, Owen Bowcott wrote the following on R [Rabbat] v Blair & Others in The Guardian:

“An initial application to launch the prosecution was dismissed at Westminster magistrates court on the grounds that Blair enjoys immunity and that the crime of aggression does not exist in English law.

The court was told that attempts to persuade the international criminal court to prosecute to the former Labour prime minister for invading Iraq have made no significant progress.

The crime of aggression was finally defined in 2010 by the ICC, the high court heard, but it has not yet been ratified by a sufficient number of states.

The high court appeal is being heard by the lord chief justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, and Mr Justice Ouseley.

The current attorney general, Jeremy Wright QC, has intervened in the case to argue that the crime does not exist in the statute book. “The crime of aggression is not known to English law,” James Eadie QC, for the attorney general, told the court.”

It was then reported in The Herald on 31/07/2017 that:

“Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the general’s application, saying there was “no prospect” of the case succeeding.

The case was brought after Westminster Magistrates’ Court refused to issue summonses in November last year on the grounds that the ex-ministers had immunity from legal action, and in any event the current Attorney General, Jeremy Wright QC, would have to give consent.”

Potential Reasons For Listing A Hearing
Therefore, on the balance of probabilities, the first hearing of R [PUB] v Hancock & Others is being processed by the legal department at Bromley Magistrates Court, for one or more of the following purposes:

To list a pleading hearing, in which case summonses will be issued to each of the defendants in due course [perhaps as early as this week].

To list a hearing of our informal application for a declaration that the autopsy moratorium on alleged COVID deaths be lifted and a moratorium be placed on all flu and COVID jabs [for a period of at least 90 days].

To list a preliminary hearing of the evidence adduced before a district judge, who will decide whether or not the case should progress to trial by jury on the charges laid.

That being said, the third possibility is a now somewhat remote one because PCP’s generally only get transferred to Bromley Magistrates Court when they are deemed to have enough substantive evidence to proceed to trial.

It also naturally follows that the action would have suffered the same fate as the Hancock warrant application [and Mansfield’s PCP] without leaving the jurisdiction of Westminster Magistrates, in the event that the district judge presiding at the court did not think that the case has at least a realistic prospect of securing criminal convictions against the defendants.

Common Law Always Provides A Remedy
Whatever the wrongdoing, be it a criminal or civil offence, the Common Law always provides a remedy, no matter how grave the circumstances surrounding the case.

Since murder is the ultimate heinous crime, mass murder by whatever means is the most wicked of wrongdoings under the Common Law.

However, when mass murder is being carried out by government policy, it is always the case that the state-controlled police and public prosecutor refuse to investigate such allegations by members of the oppressed masses, just as we have witnessed in Britain over the past year.

Nevertheless, in treacherous and dangerous times such as these, the Common Law provides the People with the means of bringing the perpetrators of mass murder by government policy to justice in a Private Criminal Prosecution.

It therefore goes without saying that, when [if not before] the PCP against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson succeeds in securing criminal convictions for multiple breaches of the Fraud Act 2006, another private prosecution will lay charges of mass murder against the defendants and their accomplices.


COVID-1984 UPDATE 12-04-21

Join the PUB become one of the prosecutors

PUB v Hancock & Others | Service & Receipt of Evidence Bundle
We just received confirmation that the case files are with the court's listing department, who expect a hearing will soon be listed, after final checks by their legal team.

It has also been moved to the court which deals with all PCPs, so we are anticipating the fireworks will start going off very soon.

We have just received confirmation that the case files in the P.U.B. prosecution of the four horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse, are with the court’s listing department, who expect a hearing will soon be listed, following checks by the legal team at Bromley Magistrates, to which it was transferred for processing and listing by the Westminster court.

Being moved to the court which deals with all PCPs (Private Criminal Prosecutions), it is anticipated the fireworks will start going off very soon.

From the very start of this extraordinary case, it was always known to have taken a goodly time in getting to its present position. The major fraud case against both the mortgage and banksters took nearly 10 years to get this far, so looking at 10 months down the line we know, not only the case is rock solid but als that there are a huge swathe of the legal system behind us and making swift passage for the case of the centuries. This will be the single biggest legal case in the history of the British Isles.

There are many side cases going on yet this one in the High Court, probably the Old Bailey, the Common Law court of the Land due to a jury of 12 good men and women true, will be the show stopper of all showstoppers. The brilliant point is that its huge impact will force by every rule book the BBC, ITV, SKY and others to report truth for the first time in decades. It will destroy the curtain they have used to cover up so much criminality.

There is a squiddling’s chance of the judge being nobbled in the High Court, unlike the lower civil court that is rampant and built on criminal practices.

So ramp up your seat, buy in the popcorn and prepare for the best seats in the house to deliver day by day entertainment of exposure you have all longed for for too long!


COVID-1984 UPDATE 29-03-21

PUB v Hancock & Others | Service & Receipt of Evidence Bundle

PUB v Hancock & Others | Service & Receipt of Evidence Bundle
For the purposes of neutralising the effects of plainly ludicrous and downright malicious claims by a few well-placed agent provocateurs on social media, the slideshow above documents the boxing up, service and delivery of the evidence bundle for PUB v Hancock & Others last week, including hard copies of the papers served by email on 19/03/2021.

As you can see for yourself on the Royal Mail Track and Trace page, from which the final picture has been taken, after entering the reference number on the mail receipt, the case files were received by Westminster Magistrates Court on Friday morning.

All being well, we will receive some kind of indication as to when we are likely to receive the initial response of the court’s legal department early this week. Needless to say, as soon as there is any news it will be posted on this blog and across all my social media platforms.

Read full report here


COVID-1984 UPDATE 19-03-21

Join the PUB become one of the prosecutors

At 16:23 pm this afternoon (19th March 2020), one year after the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens’ decision to reclassify COVID-19 as no longer being considered a High Consequence Infectious Disease was published by Public Health England, the papers were laid electronically at a south London Magistrates Court, in the People’s Union of Britain’s momentous Private Criminal Prosecution against Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson for pandemic fraud.

Early next week, the court will receive a 1,200 page bundle of evidence, which includes expert witness statements from two professors, three doctors, a dental surgeon, a probate solicitor, a mathematician, a retired nuclear submarine data analyst, an independent data analyst and a former CID fraud detective, who is acting as a trustee of the PUB in bringing this most serious of prosecutions to the criminal court.

Declaration Sought
In addition to the charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, in material breaches of sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we are informally applying for a declaration, under the inherent powers of the court, which states that autopsies are to be carried out for all alleged COVID deaths, which will be held as evidence in the forthcoming trial, on the ground that we have expert witness testimony of the falsification of death certificates, as per UK Government policy.

We are also asking for a moratorium on the UK flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ programmes to be declared for period of at least 90 days, in order to definitively establish whether it is COVID-19 or ‘vaccines’ that are killing people at a minimum mortality rate of 377 per 100,000 healthy adults, as per the leaked WHO approved ‘vaccine’ safety study which we are adducing into evidence.

Boatload of Prima Facie Evidence
They told us they wanted more prima facie evidence when we made the last application in late 2020, seeking the arrest of Matt Hancock for fraud by non-disclosure over the declassification of COVID-19 by the ACDP.

Well, now they have a veritable boatload of the stuff heading their way, so prepare yourselves for the inevitable shitstorm on the near horizon, after the defendants’ QC’s tell them that their only defence is to plead gross negligence. However, the evidence is so emphatic that they knew exactly what they were doing that the jury will almost certainly convict them as charged.

Nevertheless, don’t expect the defendants to be wheeled off in handcuffs to Belmarsh by tomorrow morning. Whilst it is just about conceivable that the court’s legal department could make an initial assessment of the case by the end of next week, even if it happens that swiftly, the matter will then be passed to the Chief Magistrate of the UK’s legal department, which will probably take at least another week to make their assessment.

Potential Turnaround
In the event all of that is turned around within the next two weeks, the case would then be passed to a senior district judge, who must then decide whether to grant the applications for the summonses and the declaration, whether on paper or at a hearing.

If the summons application is granted, a pleading hearing would then be listed to take place within the next couple of weeks. This would take us to 28 days from now and probably represents the earliest time that the defendants will be summonsed to plead in the Magistrates Court. The informal application for the declaration would also be dealt with at that hearing.

Given the seriousness of the charges and the urgency of the situation, with clear evidence of fraud with murderous consequences already adduced into evidence, we will then ask the court to list a trial by jury at the very earliest opportunity, which will almost certainly take place at the Old Bailey.

If and when all of that transpires rests on the judgment of a single district judge, who will necessarily have experience dealing with such serious charges. However, it is the considered opinion of the former CID fraud detective and the team behind the scenes who have supported me every step of the way that the Statement of Case is “monumental”, “truly historical” and:

“Regardless of the judiciary’s response to it, once the information is in the public realm/consciousness, along with the cited evidence, it will be incendiary. The accused will squeal like the little swines they are.”

Banged To Rights
Well it’s been a long month already, to say the least, which is why I haven’t really posted much online for the past three weeks. So I’m going to keep this post relatively brief.

Before I sign off, to reflect on the truly extraordinary progress we have made during the course of the past dystopian year, it seems somewhat fitting to leave you with this.

If I’d had the evidential weight we have in this case in my family’s High Court actions against Bank of Scotland, it would have taken a year to beat them, instead of almost a decade.

Suffice to say, in the words of Vinnie Jones’ character in Lock Stock & Two Smokin’ Barrels, a film which reminds me of when I was living and working in swinging nineties London, when these ancient lands were still a place where even a committed recalcitrant like myself could live freely in relative peace and prosperity – it’s been emotional.
Michael O'Bernicia @


COVID-1984 UPDATE 27-02-21

Final Review of Statement of Case
This is just a quick update, for all those who are waiting for news about the laying of the papers, in the Private Criminal Prosecution [PCP] against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson for pandemic fraud.
First and foremost, the final draft of the statement of case is currently being reviewed, whilst we wait for several expert witness statements to be executed and returned to us. Once we have received them, the papers will be laid and there are no further foreseeable hold-ups on the horizon.

Nevertheless, patience may still be required because it could take days or even weeks for the court's legal department to assess the papers, before the applications are put before a judge, who will then decide whether we have cited enough prima facie evidence to proceed.

Expert Witness Testimony
If every pledge we have received is fulfilled [and we have no reason to believe they won't be], we will be filing expert witness statements from a professor, five doctors, a solicitor, a mathematician, two data analysts and an independent researcher, along with seventy nine exhibits in support of the prosecution's charges of fraud.

It goes without saying that additional evidence will being added to the file, as and when it comes in, during our continuing investigations into the crimes alleged.

However, we already have way more prima facie evidence than the court requires to issue summonses for the defendants to plead before a senior judge, in which case the PCP will be listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.

Blowing The Lid Off The Scamdemic
Moreover, in the opinion of the former CID fraud detective I am working with, our case is the "dynamite" which blow the lid off the scamdemic worldwide, simply because all of the arguments are sustained by utterly compelling evidence, most of which is a matter of public record.

Having said that, I completely understand that there are people who won't believe any of the foregoing until they see it with their own eyes.

Nonetheless, I am also glad to say that those people remain a tiny minority, when compared to all of you who have passionately supported this endeavour from the outset.

Once again, from the bottom of my heart, thank you. Never doubt the invaluably positive effect your support has on the progress of the case.

As for the small band of so-called "long term truthers", who are currently telling people I am a government operative on social media and that nothing is going to come of the case, the truth of their false and defamatory slurs, with which I never engage, will soon unmask them as the gobshites, shills and fools they are - Twooth-Feckers, by another name.

Some of you reading this, who didn't witness exactly the same thing happening during my family's long running dispute with Bank of Scotland, can watch The Great British Mortgage Swindle, to see for yourselves that I've long since proven I don't talk the talk, without walking the walk.

But that didn't stop the Twooth-Feckers from claiming I was just a government stooge, making everything up about the three cases I ran against BOS and its receivers, from 06/08/2010 to 21/07/2014, in Newcastle and Leeds High Courts, the Property Chamber and the Land Registry, which resulted in summary judgment being handed down in our favour and two fraudulent mortgages being removed from the charges register.

The Facts Speak For Themselves
Furthermore, anybody who has read everything I have published online about the various legal battles I have had is incapable of honestly claiming I am a shill, given that I have publicly documented each case I have argued and won, as it happened, whether in or out of court, over the course of the last thirteen years, giving away all the legal remedies I devised for free.

Which naturally gives rise to the following semi-rhetorical questions for the Twooth-Feckers:

How did devising and implementing a remedy for refusing to register a birth benefit the plan to enslave our children as future taxpayers?

How did cancelling my registration as a taxpayer benefit the financing of illegal wars against other people's children, as well as this infernal scamdemic?

How did inventing and implementing the three letter conditional acceptance process to get rid of any fraudulent credit cards benefit the powers that shouldn't be?

How did proving mortgage fraud in the high court and starting a class action to cancel 11.2 million illegal charges benefit the banksters who pull the strings of the political puppets in Whitehall?

How did producing, directing and releasing a 5 star hit documentary feature film about institutionalised mortgage fraud benefit the establishment?

How did founding and developing a government free jurisdiction for indigenous peoples, under international law, benefit the UK Government?

How did drafting Magna Carta 2020 for the purpose of restoring the Common Law, benefit the architects of COVID-1984, the 4th Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset?

How did publishing information exposing vaxxtermination deaths benefit the controllers' plans for the vaxxtermination of the entire population of the world?

It didn't, is the simple answer to each of those questions, because I have never done anything that remotely benefited the government, which I have also publicly charged with crimes tantamount to genocide, lest we forget.

Peer Reviewed Papers
Therefore, it seems appropriate to end this somewhat eclectic update with the following review of the 107 page statement of case I have compiled for the PCP, from one of our crack team of legal scholars and researchers, delivered just after he finished reading the 1st draft:

"Its immense strength comes through its stark logic. I kept thinking how it is a work that SHOWS rather than TELLS the details of the conspiracy. That is the mark of how powerful it is - a distillation down to bare, cold facts of decades of genocide. It is a ticking time-bomb. A hand-grenade down the pants of each defendant."
Enough said.


COVID-1984 UPDATE 21-02-21

Join the PUB become one of the prosecutors

Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Served Notice of Personal Private Criminal Prosecution

NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]­___________________________________________________________________

Served by email at 21:02:21 on 21/02/21.


Dear Sirs,


You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’.



For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.

b. Party B was caused by Part A to rely on that false statement.

c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’, with the intent of securing the maximisation of UK ‘vaccination’ uptake, as well as past and future material gains.

a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government’s COVID-19 policies “…will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website. However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020, when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly conspiring to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.

Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to 100.8% of UK GDP [as of 20/11/2020]; and the house arrest of the entire population, which was all done by government diktats, each of which was founded on the plainly dishonest statements contained in the 4th defendant’s fraudulent Imperial College Model, which was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [which, for the sake of brevity, we will refer to as the Gates Foundation].

Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence in support of these serious allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 2 fraud by false representation are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.


For all the elements of fraud by non-disclosure to be in place, under section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A failed to disclose certain information to Party B.
b. Party A was under a legal duty to disclose that information to Party B.
c. Party A did so dishonestly, intending, by that failure, to make a gain or cause a loss.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants knowingly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, with the intent of maximising ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, in order to secure past and future material gains, at the devastating cost of civil liberties and the solvency of the nation.

a. You knowingly failed to disclose that the so called science and data relied upon by the World Health Organisation [WHO], in declaring SARS-CoV-2 to be a worldwide ‘pandemic’ on 11/03/2020, was none other than the discredited Imperial College Model.

b. You knowingly failed to disclose that SARS-CoV-2 was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13//03/2020 – before the 1st defendant presented and commended the Coronavirus Bill 2020 to the House of Commons, on the 19th and 23rd of March 2020, respectively.

c. You knowingly failed to disclose that the supposed latest science and data you relied upon to justify a declaration of a Public Health Emergency was Neil Ferguson’s unscientific Imperial College Model; and that it was known by 24/03/2020 at the latest that said model had been wholly discredited, when the New Scientist published the 4th defendant’s admission, before the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology, that he had reduced his prediction of 510,000 UK COVID deaths to 20,000, in the event his proposed lockdown policies were not imposed in the UK.

d. You knowingly failed to disclose that the executive agency the 1st defendant controls, Public Health England [PHE], received $500,000 from the US Government to “fast-track the COVID vaccine”, on or around 19/03/2020.

e. You knowingly failed to disclose that multiple WHO approved flu ‘vaccines’ are known to cause fatal adverse events in 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected, whilst ‘influenza’ normally kills around 388 per year. [The ingredients in every UK licensed COVID ‘vaccine’ are believed to be very similar to these 2019-21 mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, in which case they will have comparable mortality rates.]

f. You knowingly failed to disclose that none of the 2019-21 flu and COVID jabs are actually vaccines [they are mRNA treatments or gene therapies], which lays open the floodgates to future civil proceedings for misrepresentation, fraud and damages [irrespective of the purported indemnity granted to ‘vaccine’ companies and those who administer their products in the Coronavirus Act 2020].

g. You knowingly failed to disclose that there is a direct mathematical correlation between the 2020-21 flu and COVID ‘vaccine’ roll-outs in the UK and the deaths which the defendants claim to be COVID deaths during the same period.

h. You knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose this information, when you had legal obligation to disclose it to Parliament and the British public, and you did so in service of the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK and the rest of the world, for the purposes of securing their own material gains and those of their accomplices, knowing that the cost to the British People and the economy would be catastrophic.

i. You had a legal obligation to disclose these facts to the British People, on the ground that the 1st defendant, upon the advice of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, pledged on 01/03/2020, in the UK Government’s COVID-19 Battle Plan, that: “Public safety is our top priority.”

The prosecution alleges that, had public safety been the defendants’ top priority, all of the foregoing information would have been disclosed to both Parliament and the British People, as soon as the information became available.

Moreover, in the mind of any reasonable person, knowing this information is essential to understanding that the entirety of the justifications given for declaring a Public Health Emergency were and remain founded on a series of profoundly dishonest statements, which have been relied upon by the defendants.

It naturally follows that the public disclosure of the information described, by either the 1st, 2nd or 3rd defendant at the UK Government’s daily press briefing, on or before 24/03/2020, would have been tantamount to a confession that there was no justifiable cause to declare a Public Health Emergency.

Furthermore, the public disclosure of 8 e could and should have resulted in the suspension of the National Influenza Immunisation Programme and a thorough investigation of the allegedly lethal WHO approved mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, which are considered all too similar to the substance of the COVID jabs subsequently licensed by the UK Government for mass administration.

However, it naturally follows that, without a ‘Public Health Emergency’, it would not have been possible for the defendants to cause the lockdown of the nation “until a vaccine is found”, with the fatally flawed advice you gave in your official capacities as Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and the WHO and UK Government’s Senior Scientific Advisor on Pandemic Preparedness, Policy and Response.

The data-based evidence adduced by the prosecution also shows that, on the balance of probabilities, the vast majority of the deaths recorded as COVID deaths since September 2020, were, in reality, fatal adverse events, caused by the 2020-21 WHO and UK Government approved flu and COVID shots, in addition to those who died at home, in care homes and hospitals, who were denied palliative care “to save the NHS” from and “flatten the curve” of a ‘virus’ which has never been proven to exist.

Upon the evidence, the defendants committed section 3 fraud by non-disclosure, under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006, on the basis that you knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, which you could and should have done in the House of Commons, as well as during the UK Government’s media briefings, at various times from 01/03/2020 to the present day, when you had ample opportunities to make public safety their top priority by fully availing Parliament and the British People of the latest science and data, as you repeatedly pledged to do, without ever actually delivering it.

Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence relied upon in support of these criminal allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 3 fraud by non-disclosure are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.


Given the unbridled seriousness of the allegations made, the prosecution is applying for summonses to be issued against the defendants without delay, to have you appear before a senior judge to plead and for the case is listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.

A second application seeks a declaration, under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to act in the name of justice, that:

a. Upon the prima facie evidence adduced and in accordance with the opinion of Lord Sumption that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is constitutionally unlawful and therefore void and unenforceable, it is declared that, in the interests of providing finality to the families of those who are recorded as having died from or with COVID-19 and for the purposes of providing evidence in R [PUB] v Matt Hancock & Others, autopsies must be carried out and death certificates certified as if the 2020 Act had not been enacted.

b. For a period of at least 90 days, all flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ are suspended, pending further criminal investigations into the allegation that the treatments concerned kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected.

For the avoidance of doubt, these proceedings are being brought in the absence of parliamentary, police or parliamentary intervention, without ill will, frivolity, vexation or malice, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust.

In sincerity and honour,
Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain
All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted


COVID-1984 UPDATE 14-02-21

Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Stand Accused of Pandemic Fraud.

After yet more damning evidence arose last week, further additions had to be made to the court papers, which we are now aiming to lay in the coming week.
The four defendants will be Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson, each of whom has inextricable and ultimately incriminating connections with Bill Gates and Big Pharma.

As well as three counts of fraud by false representation and seven counts of fraud by non-disclosure, under sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we can now also prove that the entire worldwide scamdemic originated on these shores.
In fact, we can show that, without the dishonest statements and non-disclosures of the four defendants we are initially proceeding against, COVID-1984 would not have transpired.

Fraud Unravels All, Including Parliamentary Privilege

Furthermore, the 1st defendant, Matt Hancock, cannot rely upon the defence of Parliamentary Privilege, on the ground that none of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution is capable of preventing parliamentarians from carrying out their lawful business in Parliament.

The motive for conspiring to commit the heinous crimes alleged was paradoxically simple, despite the complexity of the deceptions perpetrated - the maximisation of 'vaccination' uptake, as per the UN's Sustainable Development Goal of 'immunising' the entire world population.

Jury Analogy
Just imagine, if you will, a man charged with poisoning people to death with lethal pharmaceuticals being tried before a jury rigged with people who have direct links to the companies who researched, developed, manufactured and distributed the poisons which killed the alleged victims.

The prosecution barrister would no doubt successfully apply for a mistrial, on the ground that the jurors were prejudiced by blatant conflicts of interest, which would more than hamper the delivery of a just decision, upon the evidence.

Now transpose those circumstances to COVID-1984, change the defendant to 'vaccine' and change the jury for the secretary of state for the DHSC, the chief medical officer, the chief scientific officer and the WHO's senior advisor on 'pandemic' identification and response, and you will begin to comprehend how Big Pharma hijacked government policy, for the sole purpose of maximising 'vaccination' uptake, whatever the cost.

Accessories To Criminal Fraud
Furthermore, evidence has also arisen which demonstrates that Facebook and Google met with the UK Government and agreed to censor any content which exposes this nefarious agenda.

Which naturally means the individuals concerned are complicit in the conspiracy to commit the criminal frauds alleged in the PCP, as well as being jointly and severally liable for the consequences of them.

Given that Facebook deleted my last PCP Update and banned me from posting for 24 hours, then went on to do the same for simply sharing my own blog posts on the TGBMS page, we will hold those actions as evidence of conspiracy to commit fraud, along with any other similar acts of censorship which precede and follow this public notice.

Ever-Growing Support
However, before I end this brief dispatch from the frozen north, once again I must pay tribute to the tens of thousands of people who have never wavered in supporting this endeavour, since the moment you knew of its existence.

Take heart that our ever-growing number is about to explode exponentially, when the details of the utterly compelling prima facie evidence we have amassed become public knowledge.

Deja Vu
For those of you who have been following my work for a decade or more, this moment of sudden widespread realisation will be akin to the moment people heard, in the summer of 2014, that a certain stubborn Geordie recalcitrant, against all the might of the rigged system, proved mortgage fraud in the high court and had a fraudulent mortgage cancelled by the Land Registry.

Until that happened, even most of those who supported my work at the time never believed it would actually happen, until it did.

From my own perspective, this stage of the PCP feels identical in nature, but I have absolutely no problem with the doubts, skepticism and nihilism of others, which can easily cloud the mind at terrifying, tumultuous and tyrannical times such as these.

PCP Promise
Nevertheless, I can promise that, even if it doesn't happen as soon as we would all prefer, this Private Criminal Prosecution against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson will be laid, with enough prima facie evidence to nail guilty verdicts, ten times over, as soon as the papers and evidence bundle are ready to lay.


COVID-1984 UPDATE 03-02-21
PCP Set To Proceed Against Architects of COVID-1984 Scamdemic

We are now in the final stages of preparing to lay the papers in the Private Criminal Prosecution against the architects of a genocidal pandemic fraud, that has all but destroyed this country and the world we once knew and loved.
However, the prima facie evidence we have amassed is so compelling and substantive, it is simply inconceivable that any British jury would not convict the defendants of the multiple murderous frauds alleged.

Without a hint of hyperbole or wishful thinking, the evidence we will soon be filing into the criminal court is so emphatic that it has the potential to expose the complex deceptions perpetrated worldwide, within a single viral social media post.

Our adversaries are now so concerned that the masses are waking up to the lethal nature of 'vaccine adverse events' that they are even pretending a sadly deceased centenarian didn't have the COVID jab, shortly before he died of the symptoms it is known to cause.

Despite the fact that Sky News covered his first dose of the COVID vaxx being administered, a few days before he passed on, the rest of the mainstream media are shamelessly claiming that didn't happen.

Meanwhile, otherwise healthy people are dropping down dead at the rate my friend, the prolific Scouse polymath, Mark Oakford and I predicted a few weeks ago; others are suffering paralysis and a whole host of newly acquired lifelong or fatal conditions.

Most crucially, the only common denominator between them all is that they had mRNA spiked flu and/or COVID jabs, shortly before their physical demise.

There is also circumstantial evidence which suggests the current batch of shots could be killing as many as two thirds of the over-65's, as the endless stream of post-vaxx deaths in care homes horrifyingly affirms.

I therefore beseech everybody who reads this post to demand, from the bottom of your heart, shouting it from the rooftops, that autopsies must be performed on everybody who allegedly dies of COVID-19 from henceforth.

In the event there is one courageous and honourable high court judge left in this country, who happens across this post, in the names of justice, freedom and right, you must declare an order of the court's own motion to that effect, at your earliest opportunity.

Should such a high court declaration be made, independent autopsies would determine the actual causes of death, rather than merely assuming COVID-19 was the cause, without examining the dead bodies.

The only legislative measure preventing this is the comprehensively unlawful and definitively void Coronavirus Act 2020, which effectively suspended autopsies indefinitely, even when people die in suspicious circumstances.

Nevertheless, a fearless judge would be able to rely upon Lord Sumption's scholarly testimony of the constitutionally unlawful nature of the tyrannous 2020 Act, in setting aside its suspension of autopsies.

On the ground that the families of the departed are legally entitled to know whether 'vaccines' caused or contributed to the deaths of their loved ones, rather than COVID-19.

The judge would also be able to rely upon the evidence we will be filing in the PCP, which will take place, all being well, within the next few days.

As would any brave and brilliant QC, with the connections required to guide an application for such a declaration through the high court, without delay or obstruction.

However, given that, for a judge or a QC to put their arse on the line, they also need to accept that will mean risking their careers, as well as their safety, which few if any are likely to do, the evidence will also be made available to experienced lay litigants, who fully comprehend the nature of the crimes committed and the common law remedy available.

Having said that, we really don't have any time to waste debating the issues or the remedy at hand because people are dying at the end of a needle every day.

If enough of us don't take non-violent direct action, there will be no way out of lockdown for anybody, without agreeing to play Russian Roulette with the flu and COVID jabs, which many of us would never consent to, under any circumstances whatsoever.
Therefore, here is my extraordinary proposal for nationwide non-violent totalitarian non-compliance, under the protection of Magna Carta 2020 and the Treaty of Universal Community Trust:

That every 'authorised person' refuses to administer any 'vaccines' or PCR tests for 90 days.

For the purposes of which, the People's Union of Britain will serve notice on the UK Government Cabinet Office, demanding that the suspension of autopsies be lifted and that all lockdown regulations are suspended with immediate effect, pending the outcome of the PUB's PCP.

The PUB has already set aside £10 million worth of cryptocurrency, to offer financial assistance to any NHS employees who lose their jobs and fall on hard times, as a result of refusing to administer criminal government policy. More funds can be raised, as and when required, which would naturally cover potential legal costs.

Moreover, if what we are alleging in the PCP is true [and it most certainly is], as a result of a nationwide Vaxx and PCR Strike, we would witness a rapid decline in both 'COVID' deaths and reported cases, much like we saw between June and September 2020.

Thereby proving that the UK Government's 'vaccination' programme is entirely founded upon unequivocally dishonest statements. Fraud-in-the-factum, by another name.

In truth, the motive for the defendants' conspiracy to commit these most nefarious frauds was and remains deceptively simple: to maximise 'vaccination' uptake, both in Britain and the rest of the world.

Make no mistake about it; SAGE is not a scientific advisory committee - it is merely the UK branch of an international, unaccountable, totalitarian, pharmaceutical dictatorship, bought and paid for by the Gates of Hell and Big Pharma's stakeholders.

However, in the most simplistic terms, were it not for their reliance upon Ferguson's Imperial College Model, which fraudulently predicted that 50,000,000 people would die of the dreaded lurgy without locking down the whole world, COVID-1984 would never have transpired.

Nevertheless, whilst most people are currently arguing about whether the government has been lying to us about everything from day one, so called 'COVID deniers' now have sufficient prima facie evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the entire scamdemic is founded upon Ferguson's prediction that 50 million people would die, from a 'virus' which has never been proven to exist, if his lockdown policies were not imposed worldwide.

How utterly chilling it is to contemplate that, in accordance with the WHO's leaked predicted mortality rate of 377 deaths per 100,000 healthy adults injected, around 520,000 Britons would perish if 68 million were 'vaccinated' with both the flu and COVID shots - only 10,000 more than Ferguson's prediction of 510,000 UK deaths in the initial stage of the 'pandemic'.

Despite being up against the clock to get the papers completed as as soon as I am able, I can't end this update without offering my humble and eternal gratitude to everybody who has contributed to this genuine effort to End Genocide Now, on these shores and everywhere else.

Sincere thanks to each and every one of you, for assisting the PUB in laying waste to all possible defences that our mutual adversaries are capable of mustering. Rest assured that soon they will all come face to face with the consequences of their heinous crimes against the people.

The Peoples Union of Britain PUB - join the PUB and rally to the developments for the New Era


COVID-1984 UPDATE 12-01-21

Criminal Correlation Between Vaxxtermination Roll-Out & 'COVID Deaths'

Over the course of the past few weeks, evidence has arisen which shows that there appears to be a direct correlation between the roll-out of the vaxxtermination agenda and the sudden spike in what the UK government claims to be 'COVID deaths'.

FOI Request For Government's Definition of 'Vaccine'
When BoJo's office was asked in an FOI request to disclose the definition of 'vaccine' the government is relying upon, the Cabinet Office replied thus:

"I am writing to advise you that following a search of our paper and electronic records, I have established that the information you requested is not held by the Cabinet Office."

This is clearly because if they admit that a vaccine is -
"A preparation of a weakened or killed pathogen, such as a bacterium or virus, or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection."

they would be unable to con the public and the medical professions into believing that the COVID jabs can truthfully be described as such, on the ground that it is already well documented that they are more than capable of causing strokes, heart attacks, paralysis, cancer and sudden death.

Premeditated Criminal Destruction
Make no mistake about it, as I have been shouting from the rooftops since the start of COVID-1984, the primary purpose of the scamdemic is to reduce the human population of the Earth by up to 95%, in order to hit UN dictated carbon dioxide emissions targets by no later than 2030. The genocide of Kissinger's 'useless eaters' by another chilling name.

As the World Economic Forum's Klaus Schwab has openly stated, those who survive The Great Reset will be happy to exist as property-less slaves of the self-appointed banking elite, in an international communist, totalitarian dictatorship of Huxwellian proportions, the foundations of which have already been laid.

Having destroyed the entire national economy in nine months, whilst making tax-exempt billionaires even richer on the proceeds of open imprisonment by unaccountable government decree, they are now threatening to make everything that makes life worth living a criminal offence.

Having wrecked the lives of our children, as well as traumatising them with the fear-inducing psychological warfare that has tens of millions in it's malicious grasp, they are now threatening to criminalise vaccine refusal.

Having already committed mass murder in the care homes and the hospital wards, simply by refusing palliative care to those who needed it most, care home residents are dropping like flies, shortly after receiving the WHO approved flu and COVID jabs.
Just like they did after being injected with the previous year's flu shots.

Mathematical Correlation
It is therefore just in the nick of time, given the continuation of this COVID-1984 dystopian nightmare, that I have what can only be described as truly brilliant news to share, despite the entailed horrors of uncovering compelling evidence that genocide by lethal injection is taking place before our eyes.
The prolific and brilliant mathematician, Andrew Mather, just sent this message to tenacious Mark Oakford, the indomitable Scouse polymath I'm working with on the vaccine deaths data:
"That surge from 14 September to 21 November mirrors the flu vaccine roll-out. That's the kind of indisputable coincidence we need."

In other words my fellow freedom fighters, Andrew is now able to testify in the Private Criminal Prosecution that he can mathematically demonstrate the correlation Mark and I have identified [with the invaluable assistance of the courageous researcher who provided us with the incriminating data from the WHO], between the flu vaxx roll-out and the surge in alleged COVID deaths.

Criminal Fraud & Mass Murder Charges
That means we can move forward on mass murder charges against the defendants, as well as charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, knowing we can prove all the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, with bundles of irrefutable prima facie evidence.

On the basis that we managed to predict the recent surge in deaths before they happened, using the data leaked from the WHO - 377 deaths per 100,000 healthy adults - and from the other data we've seen thus far, that mortality rate is mirrored across the world.

Nevertheless, now we have enough ammunition to take the lying, treacherous, murdering bastards down, with both expert witness testimony and nuclear powered, facts-based, legal rhetoric.

We also have the support of an ever-growing number of judges, QC's, clerks, barristers, lawyers, doctors, professors, nurses, dentists, academics, journalists, comedians, writers, data analysts, whistle-blowers, broadcasters, entrepreneurs, soldiers, veterans and even ex-bankers.

All of us are united in a singular cause - whatever it takes, no matter how long the struggle is destined to last, we have dedicated what remains of our lives to restoring truth, justice and freedom for the sake of everybody's children.

For the purposes of which, the People's Union of Britain, standing under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust and Magna Carta 2020, will lay information in the Private Criminal Prosecution against the accused, as soon as the final allegations have drafted, taking into account the very latest available data.

Stay Connected When Big Tech Deplatforms

Just in case  Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter pages disappear, as so many others have, you can subscribe here . We can be found on MeWe, Minds, Bitchute and VK.

Unless and until that happens, rest assured that the next COVID-1984 PCP Update will be published as soon as we are ready to make our move against this white-collar criminal cartel, before they attempt to suspend the Common Law Jury Trial, in one last ditch attempt to avert justice.

Thank you so much for your vociferous, loyal and passionate support of the case, which has emerged as the only realistic hope we have of peacefully ending the tyranny of COVID-1984 on these ancient shores.

There is no white knight in shining armour coming to save us from this murderous tyranny and this is no time for petty differences. Now is the moment that all those who consider themselves members of the British resistance, to unite under one common cause - the restoration of our sovereign birthrights, the securing of our children's future and the dissolution of criminal government.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |08-01-21

We now have more than enough utterly compelling prima facie evidence to proceed with the PCP against the UK government for Pandemic Fraud.
The final papers are now being prepared and will be laid in a criminal court at the earliest opportunity.
Whilst the exact details of the charges we are about to lay will not be disclosed until the papers have been laid, here is the most chilling aspect of what we have established.
A few days ago, I disclosed that heavily censored WHO data shows that the 2019-20 flu shots are known to kill 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults.
Well, after we examined UK government data from September 2019 to January 2021, we discovered that:
1. 28 million people have had the flu shot during that period.
2. 104,000 of those people have died.
3. 28,000,000 / 100,000 = 280 [x 377] = 105,560 fatal adverse events.
That's a margin of error amounting to just 0.56% between predicted and actual deaths.
If the criminal government had not indemnified all the vaxx developers, manufacturers and those administering them they would all now be dealing with the consequences of their heinous crimes.
Therefore, in addition to the litany of COVID-1984 frauds alleged, the defendants in the PCP will also be defending charges of conspiracy to commit mass murder by lethal injection.
Is it any wonder that they want to legislate to silence and imprison so called 'anti-vaxxers'?
Nevertheless, they will find that nefarious objective impossible to achieve when they are banged up in Belmarsh for their murderous crimes against their own people.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB - join the PUB and rally to the developments for the New Era


The Bait & Switch of Vaccine Deaths 
With COVID-19 Mortalities

In perhaps the most controversial post I've ever made, I can now confirm that official data shows that the first and second waves of alleged Covid deaths correspond with the roll out of this year's WHO-approved flu vaccines.

Evidence from the WHO's own records shows that the shots are known to kill 5 out of every 1,324 healthy adults, as well as causing 344 to have medically attended adverse events.
It therefore appears obvious that the manufacturers of the scamdemic played a classic bait and switch move, in order to create plausible deniability for this year's deaths from flu vaccines and to guarantee a whole lot more fatalities from the Covid jabs, which they intend to inject us all with in 2021........
Read the explosive article here


COVID-1984 UPDATE |02-01-21

We now have enough utterly compelling prima facie evidence to proceed with the PCP. More very soon - the day 7th January the time Now and the life ours in the making - Updates will be forthcoming

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB - join the PUB and rally to the developments for the New Era You are bringing these cases to prosecution. Be named for history....


COVID-1984 UPDATE |22-12-20

Prima Facie Evidence
Over the course of the past month, we have amassed a plethora of prima facie evidence, which proves that the defendants in the Private Criminal Prosecution are responsible for COVID-1984 and are guilty of multiple acts of pandemic fraud.
Whilst we are more than confident that we now have enough evidence to justify the issue of either a warrant or a summons, we are still waiting for key FOI responses, which are due to be received no later than today.
In the event we receive the responses due, we will be aiming to lay the new information before Christmas. If all the key the responses don't come in, we will be forced to wait until the new year.
However, in the meantime, here lies a summary of the allegations we can prove beyond reasonable doubt.
False Representation
The defendants knowingly relied upon the following dishonest statements for material gain, in breach of section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006:
a. 510,000 people would perish due to Sars-Cov2 in the UK alone, if the draconian measures imposed had not been introduced.
b. Sars-Cov2 is an airborne High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID], worthy of being declared a worldwide pandemic, as well as a Public Health Emergency.
c. Sars-Cov2 has been isolated and purified, and therefore, proven to exist.
d. Masks are a safe and effective method of preventing the spread of Sars-Cov2.
e. The policies introduced were entirely founded on the latest scientific data available.
f. PCR tests detect the presence of Sars-Cov2 in the human body.

In breach of section 3 of the 2006 Act, we have prima facie evidence that shows the defendants have also knowingly failed to disclose that:
a. Two days after the WHO declared a worldwide pandemic on 11/03/2020, which was also the day that the inflated Imperial College predictions were pre-published and disclosed to the WHO, Sars-Cov2 was reclassified as not being an HCID on 13/03/2020.
The WHO's declaration was founded upon Neil Ferguson's computer-generated Imperial College Model released on 16/03/2020, which falsely predicted that there would be 510,000 Covid deaths in the UK, if the strict lockdown restrictions were not imposed. He did so on the same day of the 1st reading of the Coronavirus Bill 2020, sponsored by Matt Hancock.

b. The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens, the Department of Health & Social care [DHSC] and Public Health England [PHE] unanimously agreed that Sars-Cov2 should no longer be classified as an airborne HCID, before the 1st reading of the 2020 Act on 16/03/2020. Three days later, on 19/03/2020, news of the reclassification was published by PHE, which was six days after the decision to reclassify the supposed pandemic.
Yet, on the 23rd of March 2020, BoJo decreed the first lockdown, which was given the force and effect of the legislature on 26/02/2020, despite the fact that Neil Ferguson had reduced the Imperial Model predictions from 510,000 to 20,000 deaths by no later than 24/03/2020 - the day after the initial lockdown decree and two days before the 2020 Act was passed.
Moreover, the so-called undisclosed 'science' relied upon by the defendants was and remains the Imperial College model, the credibility of which had been emphatically destroyed before the Coronavirus Bill was enacted, along with the purported legitimacy of the Public Health Emergency declared by the secretary of state, upon the advice of other defendants to this action.

c. It is well established that Sars-Cov2 has never been isolated or purified and has therefore never been proven to exist. In fact, no supposed strain of Coronavirus ever has been.

d. The defendants have all materially gained or stand to gain from long-standing commitments to maximise vaccination uptake in the UK, for the purposes of which they engaged in engineering an entirely fraudulent pandemic, in order to justify a mandatory or compulsory vaccination agenda.

e. PCR tests have been scientifically proven to detect human RNA sequences, not viruses or disease, whilst a Portuguese court recently declared that the tests are useless in relation to detecting the presence of a virus or disease.

f. It is also alleged that the WHO approved flu vaccines that have been administered from 2019-20 in the UK, which kill 377 of every 100,000 healthy people who take them and have never been tested on the sick and the vulnerable; and that these flu vaccines have been responsible for many of the deaths which have been dishonestly recorded as Covid deaths, in accordance with the 2020 Act, which provides for the falsification of death certificates.
Since the new Covid vaccines have never been subjected to rigorous and empirically controlled safety tests and because they contain many, if not all, of the same ingredients, it can be reasonably presumed that all the deaths due to the administering of all of these vaccines have been falsely recorded as Covid deaths, on the basis that no vaccine mortalities have been recorded in the UK this year, as far as we are aware.
Nevertheless, the only way to know for sure what caused those deaths would be to conduct autopsies, which have been prevented by the provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020. Thus we are seeking a declaration from the court that those autopsies are conducted, under independent supervision, to determine how many of those people died shortly after being injected with this year's vaccines.

g. A German court has recently ruled that unequivocal scientific evidence shows that wearing masks for long periods of time causes significant brain damage, via oxygen deprivation and carbon dioxide poisoning. Yet the UK government continues to mandate mask wearing in all public settings, including schools and universities, when there is no evidence of any benefit derived from mandating that they be worn.

In summary, we've nailed the charges with such an abundance of prima facie evidence that only the suspension of the criminal justice system is capable of protecting the accused from the consequences of their heinous crimes.

You can read the rest of the otherwise coruscating blog post here, should you feel so inclined.

In the meantime, please accept my heartfelt thanks for your unrelenting patience, loyalty and support. Never underestimate how integral it is to ending COVID-1984.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB - join the PUB and rally to the developments for the  New Era


COVID-1984 UPDATE |19-12-20

Work still continuing behind the scenes to pull the House of Cards Down Lawfully. We are certainly hoping for a magnificent Christmas present for all the people, including those suckered into the fraud - Intense times!!

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB - join the PUB and rally to the developments for the New Era


COVID-1984 UPDATE |4-12-20

Over the past 10 days the case has been firming and the work continues. The lack of updates is because there has not been anything to report publicly. 

Where some may interpret that as things not going to plan or failing, their comprehension of powerful, behind the scenes lawful process is meagre. Within a society that has been fed the belief that a click of a mouse produces results, the depth and intensity of legal and lawful process often may seem anachronistic, yet it is what it is and for success to stamp its authority on the process these times must transpire

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB - join the PUB and rally to the developments for the  New Era


COVID-1984 UPDATE |24-11-20

After initially being told yesterday morning that we wouldn't receive the judge's decision [on whether to issue the arrest warrant] for another ten days, by the late afternoon he had already made up his mind and ruled as follows:

1. That he was satisfied that we have the authority to bring the private prosecution.
2. That he has the jurisdiction to decide the application.
3. That it is not a prosecution which can only be run by the CPS.

However, the judge did not agree that Hancock's dishonesty is proven by his publicly documented failure to disclose to MPs [before they voted on the CV act] that CV had been reclassified as no longer being considered an airborne High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID], or that the Imperial Model had been proven to be false.
Whilst the decision could easily be appealed, we have been advised by our legal team that we need to acquire more prima facie evidence of Hancock's dishonest conduct, before any judge will issue a warrant or a summons, which we expect to obtain within the next 28 days.
Nevertheless, our legal team has also advised us that the production of the very same evidence we are seeking to prove dishonest conduct will constitute sufficient prima facie evidence of a much more serious crime than fraud, as well as conclusive proof of the frauds we have already alleged.

In other words, we've been asked to provide the smoking gun from the crime scene, so that's what is required to sustain the allegations.

Furthermore, don't forget that the urgent action we took was taken in the absence of a formal criminal investigation, while our legal team prepared their initial advice on how the PCP should proceed, after assessing the myriad of criminal allegations, to guarantee the greatest chance of success.

Now we have received that advice, we have agreed that the information in the main part of the case against Hancock et al will be laid in the criminal court, as soon as we have obtained the prima facie evidence that would remove all possibility of reasonable doubt in the minds of a jury, when [and not if] the PCP moves to the trial stage. All being well, we will have that evidence by 22/12/2020 at the latest.

Tomorrow afternoon, we are due to speak with our legal team and there will be a further update soon afterwards, laying out how the case will proceed, now that we have established the evidence that needs to be met.

In the meantime, rest assured that, whatever the establishment throws at us, be it in whatever form it comes, the PCP is moving forward, with or without a warrant being issued to prevent further crimes being committed.

Once again, thank you to the vast majority of you, both for warding off shills, trolls and agents in my absence, as well as keeping the faith, despite the wild and crazy false allegations that are flying about.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB


COVID-1984 UPDATE |20-11-20

After having no red flags raised by the legal advisers at Westminster Magistrates Court this week, we understand that the warrant application is now before the nominated judge and that a decision is imminent.
I realise that things are not happening as quickly as we would all like but please understand that it took six weeks to get to this stage in my family's PCP against BOS and its receivers in 2013, so in reality the case has progressed at a relatively rapid pace.
We must also take into consideration the fact that, before he rules on the matter, the judge will have to ascertain whether the Director of Public Prosecutions is electing to take over the case, on the ground that it is of such importance that it cannot run as a private prosecution.
Either way, in the absence of a miscarriage of justice, the warrant will be issued and as soon as there are any developments, you will read about them on this page.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB


COVID-1984 UPDATE |17-11-20

Permission to arrest Hancock granted!!!!! Filling out the form now, so no time to write more.
But watch this space for further details about how we are going to bring an end to COVID-1984, without any more fannying around.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |16-11-20

The prosecution in People's Union of Britain v Matt Hancock moves forward:
We chased the chief magistrates office all day today. We're still waiting for a reply to two messages and an email, which we were hoping would come some time this evening.
That not being the case, we will continue chasing until we ascertain how far the warrant application has progressed. As soon as we have any news on the PCP, you'll read it here first. Until then, remember that patience pays the greatest rewards.
Meanwhile, fourteen members of the People's Union of Britain, who have witnessed the emails which have passed between PUB and the Chief Magistrates office, have pledged to execute witness statements to that effect.
These affidavits will form the basis of defamation and malicious falsehood complaints, against every fraudulent fop who made serious allegations they knew to be untrue, for their own material gain.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB


COVID-1984 UPDATE |14/15-11-20

Languishing in police station under illegal arrest and detention while:

When enough people know that the secretary of state for mandatory vaxxtermination knew that CV19 was reclassified as not being a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13/03/2020 [and we can prove it with FOI responses alone], #COVID1984 will soon come to an end.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |13-11-20

The prosecution in People's Union of Britain v Matt Hancock has just sent the executed form, applying for his arrest warrant, to the court of issue.
We have already got the green light from the court's legal advisers and now we have the chief magistrates' permission to proceed. They also sent us the form to fill out for the arrest warrant, which has now been acknowledged by the same as having been received.
However, the form won't be processed till Monday, when it will be sent up to the crown court to be administered and then served upon the defendant, without delay, by the arresting officers, who will soon be appointed by the court.
Therefore, the case will now proceed as directed, unless the Director of Public Prosecutions [DPP] intervenes, which is unlikely because nobody will want to take the poisoned chalice.
However, even if they do, we can object on the ground that the DPP is working for the government, so they are obviously conflicted. If they refuse to back down, we will insist that the case proceeds with our legal team.
In other words, my family, friends and growing army of peace-keepers and freedom fighters, we are all about to witness the most significant events that have transpired on these shores, since Charles I lost his head.
Words simply cannot adequately express the truly humbling experience of the love, support and commitment I've received, from people who all tell me that my words have moved and inspired their hearts into resisting this tyranny, for the sake of our children and grandchildren.
Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for rising to the call. Very soon, our number will be millions.
This truly is our moment to seize the opportunity to build an advanced civilisation, on the rubble of the corrupted one, which is crumbling around us by COVID-1984 design.
In other words, fuck the great reset, the fourth industrial revolution and fraudulent debt based slavery.
In that new civilisation, we will protect the unalienable birthrights of the individual from the tyranny of the collective, to become truly self-governed under the Common Law, as expressed in Magna Carta 2020, an idea whose time has come.
From now until you see the arrest live-streamed on the mainstream and alternative media worldwide, let's make #ArrestMattHancock go viral on every platform, to the point where the People are chanting it in the streets nationwide.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB


COVID-1984 UPDATE |13-11-20

My experience of the past few days reminds me of Muhammad Ali's journey through the Rumble in the Jungle.
After being bludgeoned with George Foreman's sledgehammer fists for seven rounds, Ali knocked him out in the eighth round, when Foreman had exhausted himself and could hardly lift his arms, let alone defend himself.
So following my seven rounds of absorbing all the punches and low blows from numerous opponents, here lies a redacted copy of the email we received last Friday, confirming that I wasn't talking "nonsense", "coo-coo" or "fantasy" and that the warrant application was due to be processed yesterday.
Since beginning to write this post, we have received the following email from the Chief Magistrates office:
"I can confirm that the application was sent to the Senior District Judge last Friday and she nominated a District Judge based at Westminster Magistrates Court to deal with your application.
As we are an administrative office only, we cannot process your application and it must be dealt with by a court. This is now with the legal team at Westminster Magistrates Court and once the Judge has made his ruling you will be hearing from them direct."
The ruling the judge has to make is as follows:
1. Whether the criminal procedure and practice directions have been adhered to, in which case the arrest warrant must be issued.
2. Whether the accused should be arrested, or ordered to give himself up at the local police station by a certain time, to be charged and brought before the crown court to plead.
3. Whether the case is of such public importance that it must be taken over by the Director of Public Prosecutions.
In summary, the warrant application has now been approved by the legal advisers at the magistrates court in Suffolk where we laid the papers, as well as the Chief Magistrate and her legal advisers.
Now all we need to happen for the warrant to be issued, one way or another, is to clear the final hurdle - obtaining the approval of the legal team at Westminster Magistrates Court.
News on that front will follow, as soon as it comes in, whilst my detractors wince at the denouement of the truth revealing itself for all to see.
To the vast majority who kept the faith, no matter what anybody falsely claimed, thank you. Your loyalty will never be forgotten.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |12-11-20

COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE | Here is a useful evidence bundle relating to the case brought against Wancock. Also a few more bits of info

Following on from the 11th day of the 11th month at 11:11:11, by direct email to the address which is solely for laying papers electronically at the magistrates court in question.
When the papers are received, an automatic acknowledgement is generated and from that moment the information is considered duly laid.

Because it is an indictable offence, it will be transferred immediately to the crown court, where a judge will be instructed to issue a warrant for Wankock's arrest, to prevent him committing any further crimes.
If they refuse to issue the warrant, they still have no choice but to issue the summons, ordering him to appear in court to plead innocent or guilty.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB


COVID-1984 UPDATE |11-11-20

COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE | At 11:11 pm on the 11th day of the 11th month, charges of criminal fraud by non-disclosure were laid against the secretary of state for mandatory vaxxtermination.

He has been charged with knowingly failing to disclose to MPs that the fake government lurgy was reclassified as not being a Highly Contagious Infectious Disease, before they voted on the treacherous Coronavirus Act 2020.

Had he done so, there can be no doubt in the mind of any reasonable individual there would have been no possible justification for its enactment.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |10-11-20

COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE | After the de facto government's confirmation of the mandatory vaccination agenda yesterday, we are taking extraordinary action.
Whilst the additional charges against all those responsible will soon follow, at a certain time and place tomorrow, the initial charge in the PCP will be laid, alleging criminal fraud by non-disclosure against the secretary of state for mandatory vaxxtermination.
The single charge we are laying is by far the easiest to prove, of all the allegations we are making:
That he knowingly failed to disclose to Parliament that the lurgy [which has never been proven to exist] was reclassified as not being a High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID], 13 days before the Coronavirus Act was enacted.
In the mind of any reasonable individual, had that information been disclosed to MP's beforehand, it should easily have been enough for the bill to be rejected, on the ground that there was no serious public health risk to justify its enactment.
That alone should be enough to bring this criminal government down, but even if that does not transpire, we will do whatever it takes to reach that essential denouement.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |09-11-20

Given this morning's announcement that BoJo will address the nation at 5 pm today, we will be waiting to see what he declares, before proceeding with the laying of the initial charges.

On the basis that we have given the cabinet till noon today to respond to the notice we served on them last week, we will take whatever statement is made this evening as the government's response to that missive.

Once we all know the nature of that response, the People's Union of Britain [PUB] and our legal team will assess whether the allegations we are making require amendment or alteration.

However, whatever transpires this evening, the only defence any MP has is that, had they known that CV was no longer an HCID, one week before they passed the CV act, they would have voted against it.

If Johnson has worked that out for himself, his only way out is to blame Wankock, for not declaring that to Parliament when the tyrannous act was presented, as the only solution to what has since proven to be a false flag public health emergency, founded upon entirely dishonest statements.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |05-11-20
MOB says:

Today, the Trustees of the People's Union of Britain served lawful documents upon the UK government cabinet office by hand, but armed policy enforcement officers said they were not allowed to accept any such deliveries.
So a courier was engaged and they were served again, but this time we were told that only mailed documents will be accepted by every government department and the package was returned.
We therefore dispatched the documents by Royal Mail Special Delivery and they are due to arrive tomorrow morning at the Cabinet Office in Whitehall. Electronic copies are also being sent to every member of the cabinet.
Within the notice, we demanded that the UK government does the following:
1. Publicly declare that the UK Government has no records of evidence that either the purportedly deadly virus or its cause actually exist, as per the results of numerous Freedom of Information requests to every government department [which are already in our possession].
2. Further declare that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is unlawful and the COVID-19 lockdown regulations are legally unenforceable and void ab initio.
3. Further declare that the Queen is no longer sovereign [by way of section 38 of the EU Withdrawal (Agreement) Act 2020, which purported to acknowledge Parliament as sovereign, thereby forfeiting its legitimacy under the Common Law], Parliament is therefore dissolved and British sovereignty automatically reverts to the People.
4. Further declare that Magna Carta 2020 – Declaration of Rights has re-established the Common Law and must be upheld by all government employees, from this day forth.
5. Further declare that the UK Government agrees to fully cooperate with comprehensive criminal investigations into the crimes committed against the People, as alleged in Magna Carta 2020.
They have until noon on 09/11/2020 to issue the foregoing declarations, in which case [we've told them] the sentences they receive for their crimes will be tempered by their unequivocal agreement to do all they can to put right their myriad of wrongdoings.
The two refusals of lawful documents the cabinet office are obliged to accept and respond to was filmed, along with the mailing of the package, and the video will be released as soon as it's been edited.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |05-11-20

COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE | After yesterday's developments, this morning we received a reaffirmation of our legal team's 100% commitment to running our case against Parliament.
In essence, they have agreed that the laying of the information cannot be delayed for three weeks, as proposed yesterday. Moreover, the have agreed that it must be laid by next Monday at the latest - the 9th of November [9/11/2020].
So we won't be laying the information ourselves today, but rest assured that we have made it plain that if the information is not laid on Monday, we will have to instruct another firm to act without delay or do it ourselves.
It is therefore very heartening that they responded by giving us their wholehearted commitment to conduct these proceedings on behalf of the People's Union of Britain, when they could easily have bottled it, such is the pressure they are under, for taking on such a case.
No wonder 77 brigade are now plumbing the depths of desperation by accusing me of being a shill. For somebody who was placed on the 'potential subversives' list in 2001 and has been constantly surveilled by MI5 ever since, the seething irony certainly isn't lost on me.

Remember remember, the 5th of November.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |04-11-20

This afternoon, our legal team asked for another three weeks to prepare the case, just as Parliament voted in favour of a 2nd fraudulent, treasonous and murderous lockdown.

Since we simply don't have three weeks to wait and we don't agree that the arguments are complex enough to justify such a delay, especially given the circumstances, we will therefore aim to have the information laid ourselves tomorrow.

In the event we do get it done by then, house arrest warrants will be issued against the accused and we would seek to enforce them without hesitation or delay, treating the new authoritarian decrees with the contempt they deserve.

However, even if we are unable to lay the information in a criminal court tomorrow, we will rely upon the Grand Jury indictments we have already secured, which will be made public by the morning. This alone authorises the arrest and charging of all the accused, under the protection of the Common Law and Magna Carta 2020.

Parliament must now be considered dissolved and devoid of both authority to act and legitimacy, on the ground that it has been proven to be criminal in nature. The puppet masters and minions will also be indicted on the same charges in due course, after the political puppets inevitably squeal on those pulling their strings.

Just imagine the spontaneous street parties, bonfires and fireworks, in celebration of the Freedom, Sovereignty and Power of the People, if we bear witness to the metaphorical blowing up of a criminal Parliament, on November the 5th 2020. COVID-1984 would be at a sudden abrupt end and justice would soon be done.

History would then record that on the anniversary of the notorious recalcitrant Guy Fawkes's foiled plot to bring down tyrannous government, his descendants arrested Doris and his criminal cabinet, before building a new advanced civilisation upon the ruins of the Empire of Ill-Gotten Gains, by protecting the rights of the individual above those of the collective, so that such tyranny can never rise again on these shores.

This is our moment to act, so we must seize it now, in the name of securing the freedom of all our children and holding traitors to account for their crimes, under the protection of the Common Law.
Let's make it happen peacefully with nationwide totalitarian non-compliance and non-violent direct action, uniting into an unstoppable force for good in this world, without any more fannying around.

Remember remember, the 5th of November.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |03-11-20

The laying of the information has been delayed, but not for any reason to be concerned about.
We have simply being asked to provide additional witness statements, along with the abundance of FOI responses we have from every government department. In other words, no red false flags have been raised.
This means that we are now aiming to lay the information tomorrow - the day Parliament votes on whether to have a second wave of fraudulent, treasonous and genocidal government policy.
This reminds me of the PCP we laid in my family's case against BOS, when two criminal receivers were about to auction our property, on the day after we laid the information in the criminal court.
As a result of that and a concurrent injunction application in the high court, the auction was cancelled and we went on to win the case.
Therefore, even though this it will come down to the wire, fear not, because the consequences will be much worse for every MP if they continue to commit crimes against their own people.
Moreover, the People will not back down until the common law, justice and freedom are restored to these lands and a 2nd lockdown will merely trigger nationwide totalitarian non-compliance and non-violent direct action, which will bring the wheels of tyranny to a grinding halt.
One way or another, victory will be ours, no matter what they throw at us. Because we are wielding the indomitable sword or righteousness and our adversaries are standing on a quicksand of lies.


COVID-1984 UPDATE |03-11-20

Delivered failure by their persistent 24/7 attacks by 6 million bots an hour on our web resources, the other side, the Dark Side are getting increasingly upset and unsuccessful at penetrating and stopping the truth coming out.

Over the weekend a second front, that of etheric attack has been ramped up. Its magnitude is on a similar scale to the bots yet, their lack of success is as apparent as they received on the physical level.

This coming week will be a hugely important one for who holds the ascendency. At this stage it is looking like there ought to be a retirement declared, as the Dark Side have run dry of approaches, and have been left showing their complete defence, like some drunk card player.



The initial drafting of the fraud charges if complete and has been emailed to our legal team.
The final draft will be finished by Monday, when the information is due to be laid in a criminal court, from which the summonses should be issued without delay.

The drafting of the treason and genocide charges will also be completed over the weekend and will be included in the information being laid.
Given that we have more evidence that the accused are guilty as charged, than I have ever had at my disposal, at the start of any of the actions I've started against all kinds of fraudsters, we have every reason to be optimistic.

Especially as Lord Sumption has emphatically affirmed the allegations of government crimes we have laid at the feet of almost every serving MP, for failing to do what Sumption agrees they were obliged to do under the Common Law.



29-10-2020 - The office of the secretary of state for mandatory vaccinations has now admitted in a Freedom of Information Request [FOI] that the government lurgy has never been proven to exist. Yes, you did read that correctly.

To put this in perspective, this is akin to the UK banks admitting that they never lend any money, when we started alleging that against them more than a decade ago.

It therefore doesn't take much effort to work out that the pressure the Private Criminal Prosecution has placed upon every MP has catalysed the beginning of the end for this treacherous Parliament.

When Wankock's office has already confessed that COVID-1984 policies are entirely founded upon that which they cannot prove to exist, no MP is capable of successfully pleading not guilty to our allegations of fraud.

After receiving more evidence from witnesses to government crimes, the initial drafting of the court papers will now be completed by close of business tomorrow.

The final drafting will be done over the weekend and Monday has been set aside by our legal team for the information to be laid in a criminal court, with summonses to follow without delay.

The People will also seek an order placing the accused under indefinite house arrest, until a jury finds them guilty as charged and relocates them to Belmarsh and Durham jails.
If such an order for house arrest takes effect on or by the 5th of November, that would give us all a Guy Fawkes night to remember, in celebration of the metaphorical blowing up of a criminal Parliament and the end of COVID-1984.


COVID-1984 FOI Request | UK Government Admits Virus Doesn’t Exist

While preparing the court papers for the Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs for pandemic fraud, we have discovered that the office of the secretary of state for mandatory vaccinations has now admitted in a Freedom of Information Request [FOI] that they have no records which show that the cause of the COVID 19 virus has ever been proven to exist.

Yes, you did read that correctly.

Admission of Guilt
To put this in perspective, this is akin to the UK banks admitting that they never lend any money, when we started alleging that against them more than a decade ago.

It therefore doesn’t take much effort to work out that the pressure the Private Criminal Prosecution has placed upon every serving MP has catalysed the beginning of the end for this treacherous Parliament. One way or another.

Moreover, since the UK government has confessed that they have no record of the existence of the cause of the supposedly deadly virus, upon which the validity of Parliament’s COVID-1984 policies is entirely dependent, no MP is capable of successfully pleading not guilty to our allegations of pandemic fraud.
Nevertheless, here lies the very heart of the dishonesty, which all COVID-1984 policies continue to be predicated upon:

In short, the cause of the virus [and therefore the virus itself] have never been proven to exist and everybody in the Department of Health knows it.


COVID-1984 FOI Request | UK Government Admits Virus Doesn’t Exist (cont) 

Criminal law treats such evidence as proof of intent to commit fraud, for material gain.

Especially when the secretary of state in question, who has corporate interests in Big Pharma, as PSC of Porton Biopharma Limited, is knowingly pushing the mandatory vaccination agenda, for a virus that doesn’t exist.


The Smoking Gun of the COVID-1984 Massacre

Please read the Freedom of Information request for yourself below. It represents the nearest we can get to a smoking gun in the COVID-1984 massacre, by fraudulent, treasonous and genocidal government policy.

1. 25 July 2020: Freedom of Information request – Full, accurate and complete disclosure of SARS-COV-2 virus records.

2. “Please provide a full, accurate and complete list of records held within your office, and or under your authority, describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly taken from a symptomatic patient of COVID-19 where the sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (not limited but by way of example monkey kidney cells, aka vero cells, liver cancer cells) thereby eliminating contamination as a possible alternative source of sampling.

Please note isolation is used in the normally understood meaning of the word – the act of separating a thing from another. I am not referring, and hence not requesting, to isolation meaning the culture of something else, the performance of an amplification test (eg PCR test which only detect mRNA or DNA) or the sequencing of “something”.


The Smoking Gun of the COVID-1984 Massacre (cont) 

If any records match the above description and are available to the public elsewhere, please provide enough information so that I may identify and access each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, and weblink or location where the public may access it).

I remind you full, accurate and complete disclosure is required.”

2. 24 August 2020: Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

“DHSC does not hold information on the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus.”

3. 25 August 2020: Request for internal review.

4. “There is plenty of assumptions and presumptions, however there is no definitive evidence requested in my FOI request. In order to make legislation presumptions and assumptions is a breach of duty of care and can even be gross negligence. Legislature relies upon expert opinion, and must be able to show proportionality and for the common good, failing which the legislation is null and void being against logic and reason. Accordingly you are required to provide the records upon which PHE relies upon to show it has followed its lawful obligations, and that means you are required to show evidence not based upon the opinions of others assumptions and presumptions resulting from your response to my original FOI.”



"After careful consideration of the subject matter, I have concluded that the response you received was compliant with the requirements of the FOIA and I uphold DHSC’s statement that the Department does not hold the requested information.”
Source here:

by Michael O'Bernician


A Bonfire Night To Remember

After receiving additional evidence from witnesses to COVID-1984 crimes, the initial drafting of the court papers should now be completed by close of business tomorrow.

The final drafting will be done over the weekend and Monday has been set aside by our legal team for the information to be laid in a criminal court, with summonses to follow without delay.

In addition, the People will also seek an order placing the accused under indefinite house arrest, to prevent any further government crimes being committed.

If such an order for house arrest takes effect on or by the 5th of November, that would give us all a Bonfire Night to remember, in celebration of the metaphorical blowing up of a criminal Parliament and the end of COVID-1984.

  • As friend and fellow warrior, Mick Kehoe, recently pointed out, COVID-1984 ends when we all say no and refuse to comply without exceptions. If we get a shift on and achieve that nationwide over the next few weeks, we'll have the Cabinet under house arrest before Christmas, with genocide tribunals set for early in the new year.
  • If I was the government's senior legal advisor, I'd advise that they have every reason to start bricking it. Because that notorious Bernician recalcitrant has a growing army of very angry people from every demographic, passionately supporting his action to dissolve this Parliament, on the ground that a series of the most heinous Common Law crimes have been committed, by every MP who did not oppose the legalisation of crimes against their own people.


Here you will find some great videos where Michael O'Bernicia elaborates on the history leading up to this case, the current events around it and where we are heading. Also videos from Jonathan Trapman as he works with Michael to spread the word far and wide. Please feel free to do likewise - Go Here

How you can get involved and are needed to make all this happen! What to do alongside the court case. We all need to be active and taking lawful action - NON COMPLIANCE and NON VIOLENT Direct Action- find out and bring your own input and ideas to the table - Come join us in the PUB

Conditional Acceptance Letters for Schools, Employment and Care Homes

Also here are useful downloads to establish your Right to Conscience (dubbed the Common Law Miranda rights to servants of illegal authority) and also a Notice of Complicity Avoid Prosecution for Aiding and Abetting - a real shocker to wake the business community and traders out of compliance with the illegal regime. A timely download to print off and pop through letter boxes, fly post around your neighbourhood - Warnings of Snitchers, Grassers and other unseemly neighbourhood corruptions - Polite Notice to ward off Snitches, Grassers etc

Some great posters and stickers to throw around everywhere to make people aware there is one single case that will win us all our Freedom from Tyranny

Van Morrison's timely release on 22 October as a resistance song for the people! - Listen and love

We want you to engage all together in powerful peaceful non compliance and direct action that will get everyone's attention all over the land
Let us have your ideas and join the PUB People's Union of Britain the most powerful action against tyranny supporting the take down of MPs, Government and to re-establish The Common Law in these Isles.

Share This Page!

Michael O'Bernicia

Summonses To Be Issued Against Every Criminal MP 

26th October 2020 by Michael O'Bernicia
The barrister we have engaged is preparing to have summonses issued against every MP charged in the Private Criminal Prosecution, which alleges multiple COVID-1984 crimes against the People.
MOB at The Freedom Cycle

They will lay the information as soon as the drafting of the paperwork is completed and the summonses will be issued on the same day, requiring every defendant to appear in court to answer to the charges soon afterwards.

Just imagine the hoo-hah that’s gonna cause, in the event it transpires [all being well] by the end of this week, as anticipated. So please make sure you spread the news far and wide.

In addition, I’m delighted to say that our numbers are now growing exponentially and the momentum is about to turn in our favour, when every MP knows that the common law adjudged Parliamentary Privilege to be automatically vitiated by their acts of fraud, treason and genocide against the people, from 31/01/2020 to the present day.

To date, ten MPs have resigned since they all received notice that the People were holding them to account for their crimes, but I strongly suspect that number will rise before we lay the charges. Watch this space for all the latest developments, as and when they happen.

People Power Rising

Before I disappear for a few days, to submerge myself into the final drafting of the criminal allegations against Parliament, with a view to having the information ready to lay by the end of the week, I feel compelled to promise you this.

The Power of the People is rising in the north, south, east and west of these ancient isles and there is nothing that criminal government can do to stop it.

When the rallying cry comes, just make sure you are ready to join the People’s Union of Britain in #TotalitarianNonCompliance with tyranny and nationwide #NonViolentDirectAction, under the protection of #MagnaCarta2020.

As my friend and fellow warrior, Mick Kehoe, recently pointed out, COVID-1984 ends when we all say “no” and refuse to comply without exceptions. If we get a shift on and achieve that nationwide over the next few weeks, we’ll have the cabinet under house arrest before Christmas, with genocide tribunals set for early in the new year.

Therefore, if I was the government’s senior legal advisor, I’d advise that the every cabinet minister has every reason to start bricking it, despite the unlawful, void and murderous License To Kill Bill, which is, in any event, emphatic confirmation that Parliament is literally legislating to commit the most heinous of crimes.

In addition, I’d also advise them that the notorious Bernician recalcitrant has a growing army of very angry people from every British demographic, passionately supporting his action to dissolve this Parliament, on the ground that a series of the most heinous common law crimes have been committed, by every MP who did not oppose the legalisation of crimes against their own people.

Moreover, it is now impossible to deny that the UK government has implicitly declared war against us all, in the most deceitful, treacherous and cowardly of ways. When karma comes a calling, I wouldn’t fancy being in their shoes, for all bats in Wuhan.


Protecting yourself when accosted by criminal government enforcement officers

Your Common Law Rights

Some great advice from Michael O'Bernicia
In the event you are apprehended by a criminal government enforcement officer, over refusing to comply with unenforceable COVID-1984 diktats, you might consider reading them their Common Law rights:

"Under the protection of Magna Carta 2020, you are hereby notified that everything you say or do will be used as evidence against you in a Common Law court, where you will be charged with crimes ancillary to fraud, treason and genocide, should you choose not to immediately cease and desist in your unlawful aggression against the People."

If they persist in their criminal action and falsely arrest you, make sure you are not carrying anything that will identify you and stay silent until they are forced to release you without charge, 24 hours later.

They can only arrest you under section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 without a warrant if there is evidence you have committed a Common Law offence.

Which means, they can't arrest you for breaching COVID-1984 diktats, without being able to prove the government lurgy exists, which nobody can, including Doris, Demonic, Wankock and Shitty Witty.

However, should they attempt to use violence [unreasonable force] against you, the Common Law dictates that you have the right to defend yourself with all reasonable force necessary, whilst the aggressor is always responsible for any injury they and their victim incur, whether they are wearing fancy dress or not.

In other words, if they smack you in the face, it would be considered within the boundaries of reasonable force for you to incapacitate them by smashing them back in the nose, solar plexus or bollocks [if they have any].

How do I know all of this is true?

Because ten generations of my family lived in the Geordie mining communities which Thatcher's police state declared war on in the early eighties. The riot police only stopped beating striking miners because they exercised their unalienable right to self-defence.

The only reason Thatcher was able to neuter the power of the working class was too many people believed the government and controlled media propaganda, which pretended that the miners and the families represented everything that was wrong with this country, when they were fighting to preserve the power of the People to bring tyrannical governments to their knees. Things have been getting steadily worse ever since.

But the moment we start to seize back that power is here because the de facto government made a big fucking mistake in trying to being the jackboot down in the north, as if we're just going to roll over and die on command.

Thankfully, there are still far too many of us who will never forget or forgive the betrayals of the working class and we will not rest until the criminals in office are carted off in handcuffs, to start their new jobs in the showers in Belmarsh.

Nevertheless, after the passing of the License To Kill Bill through the Commons last week, which purports to grant every government agency, from MI5 to the Food Standards Agency and HMRC, the right to murder British citizens in the name of the 'national security', MP's are now faced with the following stark reality.

Under international law, enacting such a murderous bill authorises the People to use the same level of lethal force against criminal government operatives who seek to destroy us.

This is the legal right to forcibly overthrow a genocidal regime, by another name, which the Common Law also prescribes as the last resort in times such as these.

With everything I have, I will fight to prevent that nihilistic scenario decimating the lives of our children, but the profound love we share for the inheritors of the world we will leave behind, is simply not enough to overcome all, no matter how much we wish it were otherwise.

Our last chance of peaceful resolution lies in the People taking down the government in a Common Law court, which I discuss in great depth with Mark Devlin, on his latest Good Vibrations podcast.

We also discuss the need for #TotalitarianNonCompliance and #NonViolentDirectAction, which are two more
pre-requisites of ensuring we provide an equal and opposite resistance to the tyranny that seeks to destroy everything that makes life worth living.

Against all the odds, real resistance is now rising and I have no doubt that the People will prevail, no matter how long we have to fight to restore freedom to these formerly green and pleasant lands, which our ancestors fought and died to preserve for us.

It is in the footsteps of those mighty warriors we must fearlessly walk, as they did, where only cowards fear to tread, since the future of all our children depends upon our willingness to risk our lives and stand up now, before they start eliminating those they deem to be 'a risk to national security'.
By Michael O'Bernicia

Please love and share this far and wide
The URL to use for this article is :- (copy and paste)
Remember if any of our Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube accounts are suddenly deleted, you can find us on MeWe, Minds, VK and Bitchute, but the best way to stay connected is to join the mailing list here.
Long live the resistance and fuck the Banksters' Great Reset.

Taking Appropriate Lawful Non Compliance Action

Your Common Law Rights

Solid Actions to Take
What to do in the case of Mask wearing diktats
Protest achieves nothing except to identify the most vocal opposition to government oppression.

A merry-go-round of the same speakers, saying the same things, without any realistic strategy being laid out is a recipe of disaster.

To make matters worse, the leaders of the fake resistance have almost all been hand picked by MI5, for the purposes of leading everybody into Common Purpose controlled 'real democracy', committed to achieving UN sustainable development goals, including dramatic population reduction.

So what strategies would have force and effect?

A whole nation refusing to pay taxes to the government that has betrayed them?
That's a different matter.
Every man, woman and child refusing to go to work, school and university, in a series of national strikes?
Now that would bring the wheels of tyranny to a halt.

Every government collaborator being held liable for crimes ancillary to fraud, treason and genocide?
That would give every unlawful oath keepers something to think about.

All government mail, bills and bank letters being returned to sender unopened?
That would create a big problem enforcing COVID fines, as well as fraudulent mortgage possession claims.

All violent Serco mercenaries, employed as fake riot police, tasting the Common Law right to self-defence?
That would make them hesitate before taking the next treacherous job they are offered.

Restoring the Common Law to this currently lawless land, using Magna Carta 2020 to remove criminal government from office and hold those responsible accountable?
That is the only realistic peaceful resolution to the tyranny of COVID-1984.

Do you have any really creative, all encompassing ideas as to how mass action along these lines could look like?
Let us know NOW! We are instigating the PUB


Legally unenforceable demands that people wear face masks at work are becoming increasingly common and should be dealt with in a simple administrative process, using the common law to establish the indisputable facts, which I am in process of drafting a template for.

However, in simple terms, you need to send your employer a Notice of Conditional Acceptance, promising to wear a mask if they provide you with the following:

1. Evidence that masks prevent infection.
2. Evidence that masks don't cause oxygen deprivation which can lead to seizures.
3. Evidence that breathing in your own carbon dioxide does not cause bacterial infections and respiratory disorders.
4. Evidence that wearing masks does not cause stress and anxiety.
5. Evidence that wearing masks prevented the spread of the Spanish Flu.
6. Evidence that dismissal for not wearing a mask at work would not represent a material breach of the Equality Act, which entitles you to claim compensation for discrimination, as well as unfair dismissal.
7. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
8. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
9. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
10. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.

Needless to say, they will not be able to provide you with what you ask for, but you will have shown that they are unable to justify their actions, which render them liable for all potential damages caused if they try to dismiss you.

Nevertheless, even if they do, you will have already established the basis to immediately challenge them in an employment tribunal and win with such a strategy, as they would almost certainly back down before judgment, when faced with the realistic prospect of having to cough up far more than they pay you in damages.

Once I have completed the template for a simple three notice process, I will post it on my blog.
Before I disappear for a few days, to submerge myself into the final drafting of the criminal allegations against Parliament, with a view to having the information ready to lay by the end of the week, I feel compelled to promise you this.

A useful letter to send to anyone forcing you at work, business etc

By Michael O'Bernicia

Please love and share this far and wide
The URL to use for this article is :- (copy and paste)
Remember if any of our Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube accounts are suddenly deleted, you can find us on MeWe, Minds, VK and Bitchute, but the best way to stay connected is to join the mailing list here.
Long live the resistance and fuck the Banksters' Great Reset.

Share This Page!

The PUB is for the People Community at its best The PUB


Share your Creative Ideas for Mass Non-Compliance

Do you have really creative, all encompassing ideas as to how mass action along these lines could look like?
Let us know NOW! We are instigating the PUB

Video Reference for Magna Carta 2020 the Criminal Fraud, Treason and Genocide Case
and other videos addressing criminal activities of this regime

Below you can resource all video reference material helping to explain the present prosecution of criminal fraud served the UK Parliament and MPs, background to Magna Carta 2020 and related information

Videos for Magna Carta 2020

Share This Page!

Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs | Mark Devlin Talks To MOB On The Good Vibrations Podcast

Here's a conversation I had with Mark Devlin this week on that very subject and much more. Please listen and share far and wide.

Share This Page!

The Answer to COVID 1984 is Magna Carta 2020 according to Michael O' Bernicia

Michael O'Bernicia shares his common-law strategy to deal with the encroaching and relentless loss of personal freedoms in the British Isles with Nigel Howitt of .

Share This Page!

The End Of Tyranny The Restart of Common Law

Under the worst conditions possible In Oxford on 9th October 2020 the announcement of The Event was made. This unique and historic event will see all across the British Isles, the Sovereign People rise as one to bear witness to this moment in history and the return for their sovereign being.

Share This Page!

The Declaration of Rights
Magna Carta 2020

The Antidote To COVID-1984 is Magna Carta 2020, a new Declaration of Rights. Please watch, like and share this video far and wide.

Share This Page!

Is the UK Government Legislating for State-Approved Violence? - The Criminal Conduct Act

Rik Pariss of Fanfare for The Conscious
In the video today I discuss the Covert Human Intelligence Sources Act which, if approved by the House of Lords, could see State-Approved bodily harm against UK Citizens enshrined in Law.

Is it time that we reclaimed our Right to Keep and Bear Arms in the UK?

Share This Page!

Come on Down the PUB 
That is where the real action is

The Pub is a British institution, yet this PUB (Peoples Union of Britain) will see us all free and released from lockdowns tyranny, institutions taking all rights and the bloody ridiculous Join now and well give them Non Compliance like they never knew all perfectly peaceful and lawful but with the best British take on a middle finger. Got suggestions we can incorporate? Add them in the Message box! IMPORTANT: Saves it ending up in Spam Bucket whitelist email address Whitelist our email (Here tells you how - address) for this form [email protected]

Dreams and Realities A book for our time


Jonathan Trapman

Jonathan L Trapman is an author, creative writer and photojournalist who has spent the better part of his 45 odd years in public life, learning from his personal experiences, sharing them, listening to others, whose lives have allowed him to open his own mind to a beauty, even within horror, that is transforming and empowering. His written work endeavors to convey, through true tales and fiction, impressions thus garnered. Dreams and Realities can be purchased (signed by the author if wanted) here.

The Freedom Cycle

© 2021 The Freedom Cycle


Address: Glastonbury, Somerset UK
Phone: (UK)
+44 (0)1225 29 2333
Phone: (US)
+1 864-372-4820
[email protected]