Whitelist us
freedomcell AT the
so you receive your emails
We are being attacked so you do not
Easy workaround HERE


Taking the illegal government down is not a straight line but we will always feed you latest here so go check, even if there is no update!

Freedom Cell   |  The PUB            


Join Your Freedom Cell

For The Great Reveal.
details here


Come into the PUB Peoples Union of Britain

The Union where we The People lay down our Rights
One Issue - The Common Law as THE Law -All Here

HANCOCK SERVED criminal private prosecution
Parliament's only defence on charges of pandemic fraud

Updated Daily

Major Breaking News, important additions and latest 
events and what is planned
PLEASE NOTE: ALL Updates on the ongoing prosecution by PUB
will be found here

Below Historical:

Having fought numerous miscarriages of justice in the courts over more than a decade, I am well versed in determining when my legal adversaries are engaged in the dark art of sabotage.

From lightweight forms such as pretending they didn’t receive notices which were sent by recorded mail, to conspiring to have me declared bankrupt and subjecting me to an Extended Civil Restraint Order – which effectively banned me from issuing proceedings in every court – the depths to which desperate saboteurs will sink are often bottomless.

Especially when the potential consequences of my arguments being sustained are lengthy prison sentences for members of the privileged class, who genuinely believe they are unaccountable to the people they cheat, exploit and destroy for their own private material gains.

Judicial Sabotage 101
Generally speaking, the critical element of sabotaging a legal case is convincing the judge that either some crucial piece of evidence is missing, or that the arguments submitted are somehow misconceived and therefore ‘totally without merit’.

However, in the so-called superior civil courts, where judges so often consider themselves to be beyond both the law and reproach, I’ve lost count of the number of times I have witnessed high ranking members of the judiciary become aggressive advocates for my opponents, who simply have to turn up at court and spin their unsubstantiated sophistry to go home with the judgment and a hefty costs order in their favour.

Given the ultimate seriousness of laying charges of pandemic fraud against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson and their mistakenly perceived unaccountablity as officers of the UK’s criminally rogue government, it was certainly no surprise that myself and the former CID detective I am working with detected the first sign of sabotage, within two weeks of the case being filed.

Hidden In Plain Sight
As I have already documented here, our Statement of Case was filed electronically at Westminster Magistrates Court on 19/03/2021, along with a covering letter informing the court that our substantive evidence bundle would be sent by Royal Mail Special Delivery the following week, including hard copies of the Statement of Case and the covering letter.

On 26/03/2021, the three case files were received and signed for by the court, as is shown by the slideshow at the top of this post. We were then informed by Westminster Magistrates that the papers were being checked by the court’s legal department and that we would be notified of the case’s progression in due course.

After not hearing anything for a couple of weeks, we made further inquiries and were told that the papers had been sent by Westminster to Bromley Magistrates Court’s listing department for processing and that they were undergoing final check’s by the Kent court’s legal department.

Moreover, we were told the files had been sent to Bromley because that is the judicial venue to which all Private Criminal Prosecutions filed at Westminster are sent for processing and listing, once the latter court’s legal team have completed their initial assessment of the papers laid.

Deputy Chief Magistrate
However, a few days later we received an email from the Westminster court, letting us know that the case had been passed to the Deputy Chief Magistrate [DCM] for consideration and his decision was enclosed as an attachment.

Despite what we had been told about the three evidence files being processed by the Bromley court’s legal team and listings department, the judge purported to dismiss the case on the emphatically unsustainable ground that we haven’t cited enough prima facie evidence for the case to proceed.

Nevertheless, the DCM stated in his judgment that he had given very careful consideration to “126 pages” of evidence, when the final page count in the three case files was in excess of 800 pages [condensed from more than 1,000 pages], which included 11 expert witness statements in support of the serious allegations made.

It was then that we realised that the judge’s decision was based entirely on the 126 page Statement of Case and that he clearly hadn’t had sight of the copious prima facie evidence contained in the three evidence files.

As Void As The Dodo
Whilst the judge clearly believed that, in the absence of the corroborating expert witness statements, there was not enough evidence for the case to proceed, his decision to dismiss it was as void as the Dodo, albeit seemingly through no fault of his own.

Needless to say, we called Bromley Magistrates to check whether they knew anything about the decision having been made and were somewhat surprised to discover that the court’s legal team had sent the case [including the three evidence files] to the DCM for consideration and that we should receive his decision in due course.

Naturally, we gave those concerned the benefit of the doubt and provisionally assumed that the legal teams of both courts realised that an obvious error had been made and that the initial decision would be disregarded.

However, a few days later we received an email from Bromley letting us know that the judge had already decided the matter and dismissed the case in the order we had already received from Westminster.

We therefore logically concluded that there had been a very subtle attempt to sabotage the case by separating the electronic filing of the Statement of Case from the hard copy evidence files which arrived by Special Delivery the following week.

Reconsideration Trumps Sabotage
Without delay, upon our polite request, Westminster Magistrates was informed by our liaison at Bromley Magistrates that, through what appeared to be no fault of his own, the DCM’s decision was void, on the ground that it was merely based upon the Statement of Case and did not take into account the prima facie evidence adduced.

But rather than appealing the decision to the High Court on that ground, we suggested that it would be better for all concerned if the judge was willing to set aside his initial decision, despite the fact that we have never known any judge in either the criminal and civil domains to even countenance such an action once a decision has been made.

Nevertheless, within a little more than 24 hours, we were informed that the Deputy Chief Magistrate had decided to grant our request for reconsideration, as if the order dismissing the case had not been made.

Furthermore, the judge indicated that he will be reconsidering the case upon all the evidence adduced at the end of next week, with his final decision to follow shortly afterwards.

As Rare As Hen’s Teeth
In other words, the DCM appears to have shown that he possesses that increasingly rare quality among the judiciary – integrity – given that he could so easily have passed the buck to a dodgy High Court judge by forcing us to appeal his void decision in a rigged proceeding, instead of admitting the error and reconsidering the case on its merits. It certainly wouldn’t have been the first time we experienced such blatant judicial corruption.

Moreover, even if he committed the error of judgment because of foul play by a government stooge working at Westminster Magistrates Court, the judge’s integrous reconsideration of the case emphatically trumps the duplicitous attempt to sabotage it.

However, rest assured that no matter what the outcome of the judge’s second decision, we have no intention of backing down until the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984 and their accomplices are held to account for their crimes, for the purposes of which we are fully prepared to challenge any miscarriage of justice we are handed in the interim, as the foregoing account unequivocally affirms.
This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

Please Join the Peoples Union of Britain PUB is is you who are bringing these cases

PUB v Hancock & Others | Service & Receipt of Evidence Bundle
For the purposes of neutralising the effects of plainly ludicrous and downright malicious claims by a few well-placed agent provocateurs on social media, the slideshow above documents the boxing up, service and delivery of the evidence bundle for PUB v Hancock & Others last week, including hard copies of the papers served by email on 19/03/2021.

As you can see for yourself on the Royal Mail Track and Trace page, from which the final picture has been taken, after entering the reference number on the mail receipt, the case files were received by Westminster Magistrates Court on Friday morning.

All being well, we will receive some kind of indication as to when we are likely to receive the initial response of the court’s legal department early this week. Needless to say, as soon as there is any news it will be posted on this blog and across all my social media platforms.

See full report here

Please Join the Peoples Union of Britain PUB is is you who are bringing these cases

PCP Papers Laid Alleging Pandemic Fraud Against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson

At 16:23 pm this afternoon (19th March 2020), one year after the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens’ decision to reclassify COVID-19 as no longer being considered a High Consequence Infectious Disease was published by Public Health England, the papers were laid electronically at a south London Magistrates Court, in the People’s Union of Britain’s momentous Private Criminal Prosecution against Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson for pandemic fraud.

Early next week, the court will receive a 1,200 page bundle of evidence, which includes expert witness statements from two professors, three doctors, a dental surgeon, a probate solicitor, a mathematician, a retired nuclear submarine data analyst, an independent data analyst and a former CID fraud detective, who is acting as a trustee of the PUB in bringing this most serious of prosecutions to the criminal court.

Declaration Sought
In addition to the charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, in material breaches of sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we are informally applying for a declaration, under the inherent powers of the court, which states that autopsies are to be carried out for all alleged COVID deaths, which will be held as evidence in the forthcoming trial, on the ground that we have expert witness testimony of the falsification of death certificates, as per UK Government policy.

We are also asking for a moratorium on the UK flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ programmes to be declared for period of at least 90 days, in order to definitively establish whether it is COVID-19 or ‘vaccines’ that are killing people at a minimum mortality rate of 377 per 100,000 healthy adults, as per the leaked WHO approved ‘vaccine’ safety study which we are adducing into evidence.

Boatload of Prima Facie Evidence
They told us they wanted more prima facie evidence when we made the last application in late 2020, seeking the arrest of Matt Hancock for fraud by non-disclosure over the declassification of COVID-19 by the ACDP.

Well, now they have a veritable boatload of the stuff heading their way, so prepare yourselves for the inevitable shitstorm on the near horizon, after the defendants’ QC’s tell them that their only defence is to plead gross negligence. However, the evidence is so emphatic that they knew exactly what they were doing that the jury will almost certainly convict them as charged.

Nevertheless, don’t expect the defendants to be wheeled off in handcuffs to Belmarsh by tomorrow morning. Whilst it is just about conceivable that the court’s legal department could make an initial assessment of the case by the end of next week, even if it happens that swiftly, the matter will then be passed to the Chief Magistrate of the UK’s legal department, which will probably take at least another week to make their assessment.

Potential Turnaround
In the event all of that is turned around within the next two weeks, the case would then be passed to a senior district judge, who must then decide whether to grant the applications for the summonses and the declaration, whether on paper or at a hearing.

If the summons application is granted, a pleading hearing would then be listed to take place within the next couple of weeks. This would take us to 28 days from now and probably represents the earliest time that the defendants will be summonsed to plead in the Magistrates Court. The informal application for the declaration would also be dealt with at that hearing.

Given the seriousness of the charges and the urgency of the situation, with clear evidence of fraud with murderous consequences already adduced into evidence, we will then ask the court to list a trial by jury at the very earliest opportunity, which will almost certainly take place at the Old Bailey.

If and when all of that transpires rests on the judgment of a single district judge, who will necessarily have experience dealing with such serious charges. However, it is the considered opinion of the former CID fraud detective and the team behind the scenes who have supported me every step of the way that the Statement of Case is “monumental”, “truly historical” and:

“Regardless of the judiciary’s response to it, once the information is in the public realm/consciousness, along with the cited evidence, it will be incendiary. The accused will squeal like the little swines they are.”

Banged To Rights
Well it’s been a long month already, to say the least, which is why I haven’t really posted much online for the past three weeks. So I’m going to keep this post relatively brief.

Before I sign off, to reflect on the truly extraordinary progress we have made during the course of the past dystopian year, it seems somewhat fitting to leave you with this.

If I’d had the evidential weight we have in this case in my family’s High Court actions against Bank of Scotland, it would have taken a year to beat them, instead of almost a decade.

Suffice to say, in the words of Vinnie Jones’ character in Lock Stock & Two Smokin’ Barrels, a film which reminds me of when I was living and working in swinging nineties London, when these ancient lands were still a place where even a committed recalcitrant like myself could live freely in relative peace and prosperity – it’s been emotional.
Michael O'Bernicia @

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

Final Review of Statement of Case
This is just a quick update, for all those who are waiting for news about the laying of the papers, in the Private Criminal Prosecution [PCP] against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson for pandemic fraud.
First and foremost, the final draft of the statement of case is currently being reviewed, whilst we wait for several expert witness statements to be executed and returned to us. Once we have received them, the papers will be laid and there are no further foreseeable hold-ups on the horizon.

Nevertheless, patience may still be required because it could take days or even weeks for the court's legal department to assess the papers, before the applications are put before a judge, who will then decide whether we have cited enough prima facie evidence to proceed.

Expert Witness Testimony
If every pledge we have received is fulfilled [and we have no reason to believe they won't be], we will be filing expert witness statements from a professor, five doctors, a solicitor, a mathematician, two data analysts and an independent researcher, along with seventy nine exhibits in support of the prosecution's charges of fraud.

It goes without saying that additional evidence will being added to the file, as and when it comes in, during our continuing investigations into the crimes alleged.

However, we already have way more prima facie evidence than the court requires to issue summonses for the defendants to plead before a senior judge, in which case the PCP will be listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.

Blowing The Lid Off The Scamdemic
Moreover, in the opinion of the former CID fraud detective I am working with, our case is the "dynamite" which blow the lid off the scamdemic worldwide, simply because all of the arguments are sustained by utterly compelling evidence, most of which is a matter of public record.

Having said that, I completely understand that there are people who won't believe any of the foregoing until they see it with their own eyes.

Nonetheless, I am also glad to say that those people remain a tiny minority, when compared to all of you who have passionately supported this endeavour from the outset.

Once again, from the bottom of my heart, thank you. Never doubt the invaluably positive effect your support has on the progress of the case.

As for the small band of so-called "long term truthers", who are currently telling people I am a government operative on social media and that nothing is going to come of the case, the truth of their false and defamatory slurs, with which I never engage, will soon unmask them as the gobshites, shills and fools they are - Twooth-Feckers, by another name.

Some of you reading this, who didn't witness exactly the same thing happening during my family's long running dispute with Bank of Scotland, can watch The Great British Mortgage Swindle, to see for yourselves that I've long since proven I don't talk the talk, without walking the walk.

But that didn't stop the Twooth-Feckers from claiming I was just a government stooge, making everything up about the three cases I ran against BOS and its receivers, from 06/08/2010 to 21/07/2014, in Newcastle and Leeds High Courts, the Property Chamber and the Land Registry, which resulted in summary judgment being handed down in our favour and two fraudulent mortgages being removed from the charges register.

The Facts Speak For Themselves
Furthermore, anybody who has read everything I have published online about the various legal battles I have had is incapable of honestly claiming I am a shill, given that I have publicly documented each case I have argued and won, as it happened, whether in or out of court, over the course of the last thirteen years, giving away all the legal remedies I devised for free.

Which naturally gives rise to the following semi-rhetorical questions for the Twooth-Feckers:

How did devising and implementing a remedy for refusing to register a birth benefit the plan to enslave our children as future taxpayers?

How did cancelling my registration as a taxpayer benefit the financing of illegal wars against other people's children, as well as this infernal scamdemic?

How did inventing and implementing the three letter conditional acceptance process to get rid of any fraudulent credit cards benefit the powers that shouldn't be?

How did proving mortgage fraud in the high court and starting a class action to cancel 11.2 million illegal charges benefit the banksters who pull the strings of the political puppets in Whitehall?

How did producing, directing and releasing a 5 star hit documentary feature film about institutionalised mortgage fraud benefit the establishment?

How did founding and developing a government free jurisdiction for indigenous peoples, under international law, benefit the UK Government?

How did drafting Magna Carta 2020 for the purpose of restoring the Common Law, benefit the architects of COVID-1984, the 4th Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset?

How did publishing information exposing vaxxtermination deaths benefit the controllers' plans for the vaxxtermination of the entire population of the world?

It didn't, is the simple answer to each of those questions, because I have never done anything that remotely benefited the government, which I have also publicly charged with crimes tantamount to genocide, lest we forget.

Peer Reviewed Papers
Therefore, it seems appropriate to end this somewhat eclectic update with the following review of the 107 page statement of case I have compiled for the PCP, from one of our crack team of legal scholars and researchers, delivered just after he finished reading the 1st draft:

"Its immense strength comes through its stark logic. I kept thinking how it is a work that SHOWS rather than TELLS the details of the conspiracy. That is the mark of how powerful it is - a distillation down to bare, cold facts of decades of genocide. It is a ticking time-bomb. A hand-grenade down the pants of each defendant."
Enough said.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

Papers laid at 16:23 on 19/03/2021
This is a most appropriate way to serve the PCP
(so shut up all who say that is not)

Email from :
David Laity (on behalf of PUB)
4:23 PM (2 minutes ago)
to Southlondonmc, bcc: me

Dear Sir/Madam,
Please find attached documents for an application for a PCP of four defendants.
All documentation required to proceed is attached,
Thank you for your kind assistance in this important matter,
David Laity BA Hons (Representative for PUB)

PS to the Courts: Have a nice weekend

We have filed a 1200 page bundle of evidence, which includes expert witness statements from two professors, three doctors, a dental surgeon, a probate solicitor, a mathematician, a retired nuclear submarine data analyst, an independent data analyst and a former CID fraud detective.
In addition to the charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, we are applying for autopsies to be carried out for all alleged COVID deaths, which will be held as evidence in the trial, as well as a moratorium of vaxxing for period of at least 90 days, to prove that it is is the vaxxes that are killing people at a minimum mortality rate of 377 per 100,000 healthy adults, not the non-existent government lurgy.
They wanted more prima facie evidence when we made the last application. Well, now they have a veritable boatload, so prepare yourselves for the inevitable shit storm, after the defendants' QC's tell them that their only defence is to plead gross negligence, but the evidence is so emphatic that they knew exactly what they were doing that the jury will almost certainly convict them as charged.

Join us at the pub

R [PUB] v Hancock & Others [2021] | Public Notice of Intended Prosecution
NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]­___________________________________________________________________
Served by email at 21:02:21 on 21/02/21.
Dear Sirs,,

You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’.

For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.
b. Party B was caused by Part A to rely on that false statement.
c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’, with the intent of securing the maximisation of UK ‘vaccination’ uptake, as well as past and future material gains.

a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government’s COVID-19 policies “…will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website. However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020, when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly conspiring to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.

Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to 100.8% of UK GDP [as of 20/11/2020]; and the house arrest of the entire population, which was all done by government diktats, each of which was founded on the plainly dishonest statements contained in the 4th defendant’s fraudulent Imperial College Model, which was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [which, for the sake of brevity, we will refer to as the Gates Foundation].

Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence in support of these serious allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 2 fraud by false representation are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.

For all the elements of fraud by non-disclosure to be in place, under section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A failed to disclose certain information to Party B.

b. Party A was under a legal duty to disclose that information to Party B.

c. Party A did so dishonestly, intending, by that failure, to make a gain or cause a loss.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants knowingly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, with the intent of maximising ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, in order to secure past and future material gains, at the devastating cost of civil liberties and the solvency of the nation.

a. You knowingly failed to disclose that the so called science and data relied upon by the World Health Organisation [WHO], in declaring SARS-CoV-2 to be a worldwide ‘pandemic’ on 11/03/2020, was none other than the discredited Imperial College Model.

b. You knowingly failed to disclose that SARS-CoV-2 was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13//03/2020 – before the 1st defendant presented and commended the Coronavirus Bill 2020 to the House of Commons, on the 19th and 23rd of March 2020, respectively.

c. You knowingly failed to disclose that the supposed latest science and data you relied upon to justify a declaration of a Public Health Emergency was Neil Ferguson’s unscientific Imperial College Model; and that it was known by 24/03/2020 at the latest that said model had been wholly discredited, when the New Scientist published the 4th defendant’s admission, before the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology, that he had reduced his prediction of 510,000 UK COVID deaths to 20,000, in the event his proposed lockdown policies were not imposed in the UK.

d. You knowingly failed to disclose that the executive agency the 1st defendant controls, Public Health England [PHE], received $500,000 from the US Government to “fast-track the COVID vaccine”, on or around 19/03/2020.

e. You knowingly failed to disclose that multiple WHO approved flu ‘vaccines’ are known to cause fatal adverse events in 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected, whilst ‘influenza’ normally kills around 388 per year. [The ingredients in every UK licensed COVID ‘vaccine’ are believed to be very similar to these 2019-21 mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, in which case they will have comparable mortality rates.]

f. You knowingly failed to disclose that none of the 2019-21 flu and COVID jabs are actually vaccines [they are mRNA treatments or gene therapies], which lays open the floodgates to future civil proceedings for misrepresentation, fraud and damages [irrespective of the purported indemnity granted to ‘vaccine’ companies and those who administer their products in the Coronavirus Act 2020].

g. You knowingly failed to disclose that there is a direct mathematical correlation between the 2020-21 flu and COVID ‘vaccine’ roll-outs in the UK and the deaths which the defendants claim to be COVID deaths during the same period.
h. You knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose this information, when you had legal obligation to disclose it to Parliament and the British public, and you did so in service of the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK and the rest of the world, for the purposes of securing their own material gains and those of their accomplices, knowing that the cost to the British People and the economy would be catastrophic.
i. You had a legal obligation to disclose these facts to the British People, on the ground that the 1st defendant, upon the advice of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, pledged on 01/03/2020, in the UK Government’s COVID-19 Battle Plan, that: “Public safety is our top priority.”

The prosecution alleges that, had public safety been the defendants’ top priority, all of the foregoing information would have been disclosed to both Parliament and the British People, as soon as the information became available.

Moreover, in the mind of any reasonable person, knowing this information is essential to understanding that the entirety of the justifications given for declaring a Public Health Emergency were and remain founded on a series of profoundly dishonest statements, which have been relied upon by the defendants.
It naturally follows that the public disclosure of the information described, by either the 1st, 2nd or 3rd defendant at the UK Government’s daily press briefing, on or before 24/03/2020, would have been tantamount to a confession that there was no justifiable cause to declare a Public Health Emergency.

Furthermore, the public disclosure of 8 e could and should have resulted in the suspension of the National Influenza Immunisation Programme and a thorough investigation of the allegedly lethal WHO approved mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, which are considered all too similar to the substance of the COVID jabs subsequently licensed by the UK Government for mass administration.
However, it naturally follows that, without a ‘Public Health Emergency’, it would not have been possible for the defendants to cause the lockdown of the nation “until a vaccine is found”, with the fatally flawed advice you gave in your official capacities as Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and the WHO and UK Government’s Senior Scientific Advisor on Pandemic Preparedness, Policy and Response.

The data-based evidence adduced by the prosecution also shows that, on the balance of probabilities, the vast majority of the deaths recorded as COVID deaths since September 2020, were, in reality, fatal adverse events, caused by the 2020-21 WHO and UK Government approved flu and COVID shots, in addition to those who died at home, in care homes and hospitals, who were denied palliative care “to save the NHS” from and “flatten the curve” of a ‘virus’ which has never been proven to exist.

Upon the evidence, the defendants committed section 3 fraud by non-disclosure, under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006, on the basis that you knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, which you could and should have done in the House of Commons, as well as during the UK Government’s media briefings, at various times from 01/03/2020 to the present day, when you had ample opportunities to make public safety their top priority by fully availing Parliament and the British People of the latest science and data, as you repeatedly pledged to do, without ever actually delivering it.

Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence relied upon in support of these criminal allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 3 fraud by non-disclosure are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.
Given the unbridled seriousness of the allegations made, the prosecution is applying for summonses to be issued against the defendants without delay, to have you appear before a senior judge to plead and for the case is listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.

A second application seeks a declaration, under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to act in the name of justice, that:

a. Upon the prima facie evidence adduced and in accordance with the opinion of Lord Sumption that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is constitutionally unlawful and therefore void and unenforceable, it is declared that, in the interests of providing finality to the families of those who are recorded as having died from or with COVID-19 and for the purposes of providing evidence in R [PUB] v Matt Hancock & Others, autopsies must be carried out and death certificates certified as if the 2020 Act had not been enacted.

b. For a period of at least 90 days, all flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ are suspended, pending further criminal investigations into the allegation that the treatments concerned kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected.

For the avoidance of doubt, these proceedings are being brought in the absence of parliamentary, police or parliamentary intervention, without ill will, frivolity, vexation or malice, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust.
In sincerity and honour,
Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain
All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted


Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson Stand Accused of Pandemic Fraud.

After yet more damning evidence arose last week, further additions had to be made to the court papers, which we are now aiming to lay in the coming week.

The four defendants will be Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson, each of whom has inextricable and ultimately incriminating connections with Bill Gates and Big Pharma. 

As well as three counts of fraud by false representation and seven counts of fraud by non-disclosure, under sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we can now also prove that the entire worldwide scamdemic originated on these shores.

In fact, we can show that, without the dishonest statements and non-disclosures of the four defendants we are initially proceeding against, COVID-1984 would not have transpired.

Fraud Unravels All, Including Parliamentary Privilege
Furthermore, the 1st defendant, Matt Hancock, cannot rely upon the defence of Parliamentary Privilege, on the ground that none of the evidence relied upon by the prosecution is capable of preventing parliamentarians from carrying out their lawful business in Parliament.

The motive for conspiring to commit the heinous crimes alleged was paradoxically simple, despite the complexity of the deceptions perpetrated - the maximisation of 'vaccination' uptake, as per the UN's Sustainable Development Goal of 'immunising' the entire world population.

Jury Analogy
Just imagine, if you will, a man charged with poisoning people to death with lethal pharmaceuticals being tried before a jury rigged with people who have direct links to the companies who researched, developed, manufactured and distributed the poisons which killed the alleged victims.

The prosecution barrister would no doubt successfully apply for a mistrial, on the ground that the jurors were prejudiced by blatant conflicts of interest, which would more than hamper the delivery of a just decision, upon the evidence.

Now transpose those circumstances to COVID-1984, change the defendant to 'vaccine' and change the jury for the secretary of state for the DHSC, the chief medical officer, the chief scientific officer and the WHO's senior advisor on 'pandemic' identification and response, and you will begin to comprehend how Big Pharma hijacked government policy, for the sole purpose of maximising 'vaccination' uptake, whatever the cost.

Accessories To Criminal Fraud
Furthermore, evidence has also arisen which demonstrates that Facebook and Google met with the UK Government and agreed to censor any content which exposes this nefarious agenda.

Which naturally means the individuals concerned are complicit in the conspiracy to commit the criminal frauds alleged in the PCP, as well as being jointly and severally liable for the consequences of them.

Given that Facebook deleted my last PCP Update and banned me from posting for 24 hours, then went on to do the same for simply sharing my own blog posts on the TGBMS page, we will hold those actions as evidence of conspiracy to commit fraud, along with any other similar acts of censorship which precede and follow this public notice.

Ever-Growing Support
However, before I end this brief dispatch from the frozen north, once again I must pay tribute to the tens of thousands of people who have never wavered in supporting this endeavour, since the moment you knew of its existence.

Take heart that our ever-growing number is about to explode exponentially, when the details of the utterly compelling prima facie evidence we have amassed become public knowledge.

Deja Vu
For those of you who have been following my work for a decade or more, this moment of sudden widespread realisation will be akin to the moment people heard, in the summer of 2014, that a certain stubborn Geordie recalcitrant, against all the might of the rigged system, proved mortgage fraud in the high court and had a fraudulent mortgage cancelled by the Land Registry.

Until that happened, even most of those who supported my work at the time never believed it would actually happen, until it did.
From my own perspective, this stage of the PCP feels identical in nature, but I have absolutely no problem with the doubts, skepticism and nihilism of others, which can easily cloud the mind at terrifying, tumultuous and tyrannical times such as these.

PCP Promise
Nevertheless, I can promise that, even if it doesn't happen as soon as we would all prefer, this Private Criminal Prosecution against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson will be laid, with enough prima facie evidence to nail guilty verdicts, ten times over, as soon as the papers and evidence bundle are ready to lay.

Please Join the Peoples Union of Britain PUB is is you who are bringing these cases

When BoJo's office was asked in an FOI request to disclose the definition of 'vaccine' the government is relying upon, the Cabinet Office replied thus:

"I am writing to advise you that following a search of our paper and electronic records, I have established that the information you requested is not held by the Cabinet Office."

This is clearly because if they admit that a vaccine is

"A preparation of a weakened or killed pathogen, such as a bacterium or virus, or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection."

[meaning of vaccine]

they would be unable to con the public and the medical professions that the COVID-1984 jabs cannot truthfully be described as such, on the ground that it is already well documented that they are more than capable of causing strokes, heart attacks, paralysis, cancer and sudden death.

[Daily Record Care Home article]

Make no mistake about it, as I have been shouting from the rooftops since the start of COVID-1984, the primary purpose of the scamdemic is to reduce the human population of the Earth by up to 95%.

Full Update here........

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

PCP Set To Proceed Against Architects of COVID-1984 Scamdemic
We are now in the final stages of preparing to lay the papers in the Private Criminal Prosecution [PCP] against the architects of a genocidal pandemic fraud, that has all but destroyed this country and the world we once knew and loved.

However, the prima facie evidence we have amassed is so compelling and substantive, it is simply inconceivable that any British jury would not convict the defendants of the multiple murderous frauds alleged.

Without a hint of hyperbole or wishful thinking, the evidence we will soon be filing into the criminal court is so emphatic that it has the potential to expose the complex deceptions perpetrated worldwide, within a single viral social media post.

Distortion & Spin
Our adversaries are now so concerned that the masses are waking up to the lethal nature of ‘vaccine adverse events’ that they are even pretending a sadly deceased centenarian didn’t have the COVID jab, shortly before he died of the symptoms it is known to cause or exacerbate [pneumonia].

Despite the fact that Sky News covered his first dose of the COVID vaxx being administered, a few days before he passed on, the rest of the mainstream media are shamelessly asking why that didn’t happen.

Meanwhile, otherwise healthy people are dropping down dead at the rate my friend, the prolific Scouse polymath, Mark Oakford and I predicted a few weeks ago; others are suffering paralysis and a whole host of newly acquired lifelong or fatal conditions.

Common Denominator
Most crucially, the only common denominator between them all is that they had mRNA spiked flu and/or COVID jabs, shortly before the onset of the often fatal adverse events.

In addition, there is also circumstantial evidence which suggests the current batch of shots could be killing as many as two thirds of the over-65’s, as the endless stream of post-vaxx deaths in care homes around the world horrifyingly affirms.

It is therefore way past time the People demand that immediate action must be taken to lift the unlawful suspension of autopsies.

Lift The Suspension of Autopsies
I therefore beseech every Briton who reads this post to demand, from the bottom of your heart, shouting it from the rooftops, that autopsies must be performed on everybody who allegedly dies of COVID-19 from henceforth.

In the event there is one courageous and honourable high court judge left in this country, who happens across this post, in the names of justice, freedom and right, you must declare an order of the court’s own motion to that effect, at your earliest opportunity.

Should such a high court declaration be made, independent autopsies would determine the actual causes of death, rather than merely assuming COVID-19 was the cause, without examining the dead bodies.

The Offending Act
The only legislative measure preventing this is the comprehensively unlawful and definitively void Coronavirus Act 2020, which effectively suspended autopsies indefinitely, even when people die in suspicious circumstances.

Nevertheless, a fearless judge would be able to rely upon Lord Sumption’s scholarly testimony of the constitutionally unlawful nature of the tyrannous 2020 Act, in setting aside its suspension of autopsies.

On the ground that the families of the departed are legally entitled to know with finality whether ‘vaccines’ caused or contributed to the deaths of their loved ones, rather than COVID-19, as alleged by the defendants to the PCP.

PCP Papers About To Be Laid
However, the judge would also be able to rely upon the evidence we will be filing in the PCP, which will take place, all being well, within the next few days.

As would any brave and brilliant QC, with the connections required to guide an application for such a declaration through the high court, without delay or obstruction.

However, given that, for a judge or a QC to put their arse on the line, they also need to accept that will mean risking their careers, as well as their safety, which few if any are likely to do, the evidence will also be made available to experienced professional and lay litigants, who fully comprehend the nature of the crimes committed and the common law remedy available.

Non-Violent Direct Action
Having said that, we really don’t have any time to waste debating the issues, the law or the remedy at hand because people are dying at the end of a needle every day.

If enough of us don’t take non-violent direct action, right here, right now, there will be no way out of lockdown for anybody, without agreeing to play Russian Roulette with the flu and COVID jabs, which many of us would never consent to, under any circumstances whatsoever.

Therefore, here is an extraordinary proposal for nationwide non-violent totalitarian non-compliance, under the protection of Magna Carta 2020 and the Treaty of Universal Community Trust:

That every ‘authorised person’ refuses to administer any ‘vaccines’ or PCR tests for at least 90 days, in order to determine why it is that mathematical evidence shows such striking correlations between recorded ‘COVID’ deaths, cases and the UK Government’s national vaccination programme.

Demand For Autopsies
For the purposes of which, the People’s Union of Britain will serve notice on the UK Government Cabinet Office, demanding that the suspension of autopsies be lifted and that all lockdown regulations are suspended with immediate effect, pending the gathering of evidence during the proposed 90 day Vaxx and PCR Strike, the outcome of which we intend to rely on as incontrovertible prima facie evidence in the PCP.

The PUB has already set aside £10 million worth of cryptocurrency, to offer financial assistance to any NHS employees who lose their jobs and fall on hard times, as a result of refusing to administer criminal government policy. More funds can be raised, as and when required, which would naturally cover potential legal costs.

Moreover, if what we are alleging in the PCP is true [and it most certainly is], as a result of a nationwide Vaxx and PCR Strike, we would witness a rapid decline and flat-lining in both ‘COVID’ deaths and reported cases, much like we saw between June and September 2020, at the end of the 2019-20 national ‘vaccination’ programme’s adverse events window.

Thereby proving that the UK Government’s ‘vaccination’ programme is entirely founded upon a series of unequivocally dishonest statements, each of which was deliberately intended to create the circumstances required to justify the measures imposed, for the purposes of procuring material gain for themselves, Bill Gates and Big Pharma stakeholders. Fraud-in-the-factum, by another name.

Maximisation of ‘Vaccination’ Uptake
In truth, the motive for the defendants’ conspiracy to commit these most nefarious frauds was and remains deceptively simple: to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake, both in Britain and the rest of the world.

Make no mistake about it; SAGE is not a scientific advisory committee – it is merely the UK branch of an international, unaccountable, totalitarian, pharmaceutical dictatorship, bought and paid for by the Gates of Hell and Big Pharma’s stakeholders.

However, in the most simplistic terms, were it not for their reliance upon Ferguson’s Imperial College Model, which fraudulently predicted that 50,000,000 people would die of the dreaded lurgy without locking down the whole world, COVID-1984 would never have transpired.

Ferguson’s Chilling Prediction
Nevertheless, whilst most people are currently arguing about whether the government has been lying to us about everything from day one, so called ‘COVID deniers’ now have sufficient prima facie evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the entire scamdemic is founded upon Ferguson’s prediction that 50 million people would die, from a ‘virus’ which has never been proven to exist, if his lockdown policies were not imposed worldwide.

How utterly chilling it is to contemplate that, in accordance with the WHO’s leaked predicted mortality rate of 377 deaths per 100,000 healthy adults injected, around 520,000 Britons would perish if 68 million were ‘vaccinated’ with both the flu and COVID shots – only 10,000 more than Ferguson’s prediction of 510,000 UK deaths in the initial stage of the ‘pandemic’ he invented, using a computer-generated predictive model which Bill Gates paid for the development of.

End Genocide Now
Despite being up against the clock to get the papers completed as as soon as I am able, I can’t end this update without offering my humble and eternal gratitude to everybody who has contributed to this genuine effort to End Genocide Now, on these shores and everywhere else.

Sincere thanks to each and every one of you, for assisting the PUB in laying waste to all possible defences that our mutual adversaries are capable of mustering in the PCP.

Rest assured that one day very soon they will all come face to face with the consequences of their heinous crimes against the People, when the PUB’s PCP exposes to the world the substantive evidence that the ‘vaccines’ the defendants want each of us to be injected with twice a year kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults ‘vaccinated’.
Join us at the pub

COVID-1984 PCP Update | We now have more than enough utterly compelling prima facie evidence to proceed with the PCP against the UK government for Pandemic Fraud.
The final papers are now being prepared and will be laid in a criminal court at the earliest opportunity.
Whilst the exact details of the charges we are about to lay will not be disclosed until the papers have been laid, here is the most chilling aspect of what we have established.

A few days ago, I disclosed that heavily censored WHO data shows that the 2019-20 flu shots are known to kill 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults.

Well, after we examined UK government data from September 2019 to January 2021, we discovered that:

1. 28 million people have had the flu shot during that period.
2. 104,000 of those people have died.
3. 28,000,000 / 100,000 = 280 [x 377] = 105,560 fatal adverse events.

That's a margin of error amounting to just 0.56% between predicted and actual deaths.

If the criminal government had not indemnified all the vaxx developers, manufacturers and those administering them they would all now be dealing with the consequences of their heinous crimes.

Therefore, in addition to the litany of COVID-1984 frauds alleged, the defendants in the PCP will also be defending charges of conspiracy to commit mass murder by lethal injection.
Is it any wonder that they want to legislate to silence and imprison so called 'anti-vaxxers'?

Nevertheless, they will find that nefarious objective impossible to achieve when they are banged up in Belmarsh for their murderous crimes against their own people.

We now have enough utterly compelling prima facie evidence to proceed with the PCP. More very soon - the day 7th January the time Now and the life ours in the making - Updates will be forthcoming

Please Join the Peoples Union of Britain PUB is is you who are bringing these cases

COVID-1984 PCP Update | Prima Facie Evidence of Pandemic Fraud.
Over the course of the past month, we have amassed a plethora of prima facie evidence, which proves that the defendants in the Private Criminal Prosecution are responsible for COVID-1984 and are guilty of multiple acts of pandemic fraud.
Whilst we are more than confident that we now have enough evidence to justify the issue of either a warrant or a summons, we are still waiting for key FOI responses, which are due to be received no later than today.
In the event we receive the responses due, we will be aiming to lay the new information before Christmas. If all the key the responses don't come in, we will be forced to wait until the new year.
However, in the meantime, here lies a summary of the allegations we can prove beyond reasonable doubt.

False Representation
The defendants knowingly relied upon the following dishonest statements for material gain, in breach of section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006:
a. 510,000 people would perish due to Sars-Cov2 in the UK alone, if the draconian measures imposed had not been introduced.
b. Sars-Cov2 is an airborne High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID], worthy of being declared a worldwide pandemic, as well as a Public Health Emergency.
c. Sars-Cov2 has been isolated and purified, and therefore, proven to exist.
d. Masks are a safe and effective method of preventing the spread of Sars-Cov2.
e. The policies introduced were entirely founded on the latest scientific data available.
f. PCR tests detect the presence of Sars-Cov2 in the human body.

In breach of section 3 of the 2006 Act, we have prima facie evidence that shows the defendants have also knowingly failed to disclose that:
a. Two days after the WHO declared a worldwide pandemic on 11/03/2020, which was also the day that the inflated Imperial College predictions were pre-published and disclosed to the WHO, Sars-Cov2 was reclassified as not being an HCID on 13/03/2020.
The WHO's declaration was founded upon Neil Ferguson's computer-generated Imperial College Model released on 16/03/2020, which falsely predicted that there would be 510,000 Covid deaths in the UK, if the strict lockdown restrictions were not imposed. He did so on the same day of the 1st reading of the Coronavirus Bill 2020, sponsored by Matt Hancock.
b. The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens, the Department of Health & Social care [DHSC] and Public Health England [PHE] unanimously agreed that Sars-Cov2 should no longer be classified as an airborne HCID, before the 1st reading of the 2020 Act on 16/03/2020. Three days later, on 19/03/2020, news of the reclassification was published by PHE, which was six days after the decision to reclassify the supposed pandemic.
Yet, on the 23rd of March 2020, BoJo decreed the first lockdown, which was given the force and effect of the legislature on 26/02/2020, despite the fact that Neil Ferguson had reduced the Imperial Model predictions from 510,000 to 20,000 deaths by no later than 24/03/2020 - the day after the initial lockdown decree and two days before the 2020 Act was passed.
Moreover, the so-called undisclosed 'science' relied upon by the defendants was and remains the Imperial College model, the credibility of which had been emphatically destroyed before the Coronavirus Bill was enacted, along with the purported legitimacy of the Public Health Emergency declared by the secretary of state, upon the advice of other defendants to this action.
c. It is well established that Sars-Cov2 has never been isolated or purified and has therefore never been proven to exist. In fact, no supposed strain of Coronavirus ever has been.
d. The defendants have all materially gained or stand to gain from long-standing commitments to maximise vaccination uptake in the UK, for the purposes of which they engaged in engineering an entirely fraudulent pandemic, in order to justify a mandatory or compulsory vaccination agenda.
e. PCR tests have been scientifically proven to detect human RNA sequences, not viruses or disease, whilst a Portuguese court recently declared that the tests are useless in relation to detecting the presence of a virus or disease.
f. It is also alleged that the WHO approved flu vaccines that have been administered from 2019-20 in the UK, which kill 377 of every 100,000 healthy people who take them and have never been tested on the sick and the vulnerable; and that these flu vaccines have been responsible for many of the deaths which have been dishonestly recorded as Covid deaths, in accordance with the 2020 Act, which provides for the falsification of death certificates.
Since the new Covid vaccines have never been subjected to rigorous and empirically controlled safety tests and because they contain many, if not all, of the same ingredients, it can be reasonably presumed that all the deaths due to the administering of all of these vaccines have been falsely recorded as Covid deaths, on the basis that no vaccine mortalities have been recorded in the UK this year, as far as we are aware.
Nevertheless, the only way to know for sure what caused those deaths would be to conduct autopsies, which have been prevented by the provisions of the Coronavirus Act 2020. Thus we are seeking a declaration from the court that those autopsies are conducted, under independent supervision, to determine how many of those people died shortly after being injected with this year's vaccines.
g. A German court has recently ruled that unequivocal scientific evidence shows that wearing masks for long periods of time causes significant brain damage, via oxygen deprivation and carbon dioxide poisoning. Yet the UK government continues to mandate mask wearing in all public settings, including schools and universities, when there is no evidence of any benefit derived from mandating that they be worn.
In summary, we've nailed the charges with such an abundance of prima facie evidence that only the suspension of the criminal justice system is capable of protecting the accused from the consequences of their heinous crimes.
You can read the rest of the otherwise coruscating blog post here, should you feel so inclined.
In the meantime, please accept my heartfelt thanks for your unrelenting patience, loyalty and support. Never underestimate how integral it is to ending COVID-1984.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

So far 10 days of no news updates as the process of digging deeper to seal it permanently as watertight continues. No news really is good news, so patience and keeping the word getting out is all we ask.
This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

The Bait & Switch of Vaccine Deaths
With COVID-19 Mortalities

In perhaps the most controversial post I've ever made, I can now confirm that official data shows that the first and second waves of alleged Covid deaths correspond with the roll out of this year's WHO-approved flu vaccines.

Evidence from the WHO's own records shows that the shots are known to kill 5 out of every 1,324 healthy adults, as well as causing 344 to have medically attended adverse events.
It therefore appears obvious that the manufacturers of the scamdemic played a classic bait and switch move, in order to create plausible deniability for this year's deaths from flu vaccines and to guarantee a whole lot more fatalities from the Covid jabs, which they intend to inject us all with in 2021. - read full reveal here

Work still continuing behind the scenes to pull the House of Cards Down Lawfully. We are certainly hoping for a magnificent Christmas present for all the people, including those suckered into the fraud - Intense times!!

After initially being told yesterday morning that we wouldn't receive the judge's decision [on whether to issue the arrest warrant] for another ten days, by the late afternoon he had already made up his mind and ruled as follows:
1. That he was satisfied that we have the authority to bring the private prosecution.
2. That he has the jurisdiction to decide the application.
3. That it is not a prosecution which can only be run by the CPS full details here

Please Join the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

It is apparent that the process of serving and obtaining an arrest warrant looks like taking a tad longer.

We chased the chief magistrates office all day today. We're still waiting for a reply to two messages and an email, which we were hoping would come some time this evening.
That not being the case, we will continue chasing until we ascertain how far the warrant application has progressed. As soon as we have any news on the PCP, you'll read it here first. Until then, remember that patience pays the greatest rewards.
Meanwhile, fourteen members of the People's Union of Britain, who have witnessed the emails which have passed between PUB and the Chief Magistrates office, have pledged to execute witness statements to that effect.
These affidavits will form the basis of defamation and malicious falsehood complaints, against every fraudulent fop who made serious allegations they knew to be untrue, for their own material gain.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

It is apparent that the process of serving and obtaining an arrest warrant looks like taking a tad longer.

We chased the chief magistrates office all day today. We're still waiting for a reply to two messages and an email, which we were hoping would come some time this evening.
That not being the case, we will continue chasing until we ascertain how far the warrant application has progressed. As soon as we have any news on the PCP, you'll read it here first. Until then, remember that patience pays the greatest rewards.
Meanwhile, fourteen members of the People's Union of Britain, who have witnessed the emails which have passed between PUB and the Chief Magistrates office, have pledged to execute witness statements to that effect.
These affidavits will form the basis of defamation and malicious falsehood complaints, against every fraudulent fop who made serious allegations they knew to be untrue, for their own material gain.
This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

After having no red flags raised by the legal advisers at Westminster Magistrates Court this week, we understand that the warrant application is now before the nominated judge and that a decision is imminent.
I realise that things are not happening as quickly as we would all like but please understand that it took six weeks to get to this stage in my family's PCP against BOS and its receivers in 2013, so in reality the case has progressed at a relatively rapid pace.
We must also take into consideration the fact that, before he rules on the matter, the judge will have to ascertain whether the Director of Public Prosecutions is electing to take over the case, on the ground that it is of such importance that it cannot run as a private prosecution.
Either way, in the absence of a miscarriage of justice, the warrant will be issued and as soon as there are any developments, you will read about them on this page.

More search for the existence of the stuff of recommendations and diktats show no sign of appearing. Many who went walkies yesterday were banged up on trumped up charges and told they had broken what now looks like being, a) non-existent laws but unlawful laws - oh dear that means trouble ahead for the colluding parties into criminal fraud

All over the land there were walks in the park gatherings of joy and freedom and many people talked to each other about the farce that is Covid and a non existent virus.

It seems the Government looked all over each and every department and found no proof of existence nor life in either virus or the Covid appellation

Permission to arrest Hancock granted Filling out the form now no time to write
But watch this space for further details about how we are going to bring an end to COVID-1984, without any more fannying around. #PeoplesUnionofBritain #endthetyranny

COVID-1984 NEWSFLASH | The prosecution in People's Union of Britain v Matt Hancock has just sent the executed form, applying for his arrest warrant, to the court of issue.
We have already got the green light from the court's legal advisers and now we have the chief magistrates' permission to proceed. They also sent us the form to fill out for the arrest warrant, which has now been acknowledged by the same as having been received.
However, the form won't be processed till Monday, when it will be sent up to the crown court to be administered and then served upon the defendant, without delay, by the arresting officers, who will soon be appointed by the court.
Therefore, the case will now proceed as directed, unless the Director of Public Prosecutions [DPP] intervenes, which is unlikely because nobody will want to take the poisoned chalice.
However, even if they do, we can object on the ground that the DPP is working for the government, so they are obviously conflicted. If they refuse to back down, we will insist that the case proceeds with our legal team.
In other words, my family, friends and growing army of peace-keepers and freedom fighters, we are all about to witness the most significant events that have transpired on these shores, since Charles I lost his head.
Words simply cannot adequately express the truly humbling experience of the love, support and commitment I've received, from people who all tell me that my words have moved and inspired their hearts into resisting this tyranny, for the sake of our children and grandchildren.
Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for rising to the call. Very soon, our number will be millions.
This truly is our moment to seize the opportunity to build an advanced civilisation, on the rubble of the corrupted one, which is crumbling around us by COVID-1984 design.
In other words, fuck the great reset, the fourth industrial revolution and fraudulent debt based slavery.
In that new civilisation, we will protect the unalienable birthrights of the individual from the tyranny of the collective, to become truly self-governed under the Common Law, as expressed in Magna Carta 2020, an idea whose time has come.
From now until you see the arrest live-streamed on the mainstream and alternative media worldwide, let's make #ArrestMattHancock go viral on every platform, to the point where the People are chanting it in the streets nationwide.
This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

Here is a useful evidence bundle relating to the case brought against Wancock. Also a few more bits of info

Following on from the 11th day of the 11th month at 11:11:11, by direct email to the address which is solely for laying papers electronically at the magistrates court in question.
When the papers are received, an automatic acknowledgement is generated and from that moment the information is considered duly laid.

Because it is an indictable offence, it will be transferred immediately to the crown court, where a judge will be instructed to issue a warrant for Wankock's arrest, to prevent him committing any further crimes.
If they refuse to issue the warrant, they still have no choice but to issue the summons, ordering him to appear in court to plead innocent or guilty.

This has been submitted under the Peoples Union of Britain PUB

23.00 - COVID-1984 UPDATE | At 11:11 pm on the 11th day of the 11th month, charges of criminal fraud by non-disclosure were laid against the secretary of state for mandatory vaxxtermination.

He has been charged with knowingly failing to disclose to MPs that the fake government lurgy was reclassified as not being a Highly Contagious Infectious Disease, before they voted on the treacherous Coronavirus Act 2020.

Had he done so, there can be no doubt in the mind of any reasonable individual there would have been no possible justification for its enactment. #Wancock

After the de facto government's confirmation of the mandatory vaccination agenda yesterday, we are taking extraordinary action.
Whilst the additional charges against all those responsible will soon follow, at a certain time and place tomorrow, the initial charge in the PCP will be laid, alleging criminal fraud by non-disclosure against the secretary of state for mandatory vaxxtermination.
The single charge we are laying is by far the easiest to prove, of all the allegations we are making:
That he knowingly failed to disclose to Parliament that the lurgy [which has never been proven to exist] was reclassified as not being a High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID], 13 days before the Coronavirus Act was enacted.
In the mind of any reasonable individual, had that information been disclosed to MP's beforehand, it should easily have been enough for the bill to be rejected, on the ground that there was no serious public health risk to justify its enactment.
That alone should be enough to bring this criminal government down, but even if that does not transpire, we will do whatever it takes to reach that essential denouement.


Given this morning's announcement that BoJo will address the nation at 5 pm today, we will be waiting to see what he declares, before proceeding with the laying of the initial charges.
On the basis that we have given the cabinet till noon today to respond to the notice we served on them last week, we will take whatever statement is made this evening as the government's response to that missive.
Once we all know the nature of that response, the People's Union of Britain [PUB] and our legal team will assess whether the allegations we are making require amendment or alteration.
However, whatever transpires this evening, the only defence any MP has is that, had they known that CV was no longer an HCID, one week before they passed the CV act, they would have voted against it.
If Johnson has worked that out for himself, his only way out is to blame Wankock, for not declaring that to Parliament when the tyrannous act was presented, as the only solution to what has since proven to be a false flag public health emergency, founded upon entirely dishonest statements.

At a rally in Stroud, Glos UK Jonathan Trapman read the Common Law Right to Conscience in the face of a multitude of Police Officers intent on arrest. This reading of what has been dubbed the Common Law Miranda rights, put the police on notice that any interference, harm, injury or attempted arrest under illegal diktats not of the Common Law would invoke arrest of each officer

The Police stood down and retreated. The first public evidence of the Common Law properly executed in situ. Arrests were however made of the organiser and several others. Those responsible for such arrests will be criminally prosecuted under the Common Law

Cabinet served papers and notice that Common Law is now only lawful law of the land and demands and conditions are attached

Even 6 million bits attacking every hour cannot still take down the prosecution, while......

The office of the secretary of state for mandatory vaccinations has now admitted in a Freedom of Information Request [FOI] that the government lurgy has never been proven to exist. Yes, you did read that correctly.

To put this in perspective, this is akin to the UK banks admitting that they never lend any money, when we started alleging that against them more than a decade ago.

It therefore doesn't take much effort to work out that the pressure the Private Criminal Prosecution has placed upon every MP has catalysed the beginning of the end for this treacherous Parliament.

When Wankock's office has already confessed that COVID-1984 policies are entirely founded upon that which they cannot prove to exist, no MP is capable of successfully pleading not guilty to our allegations of fraud.

After receiving more evidence from witnesses to government crimes, the initial drafting of the court papers will now be completed by close of business tomorrow.

The final drafting will be done over the weekend and Monday has been set aside by our legal team for the information to be laid in a criminal court, with summonses to follow without delay.

The People will also seek an order placing the accused under indefinite house arrest, until a jury finds them guilty as charged and relocates them to Belmarsh and Durham jails.

If such an order for house arrest takes effect on or by the 5th of November, that would give us all a Guy Fawkes night to remember, in celebration of the metaphorical blowing up of a criminal Parliament and the end of COVID-1984.

Yesterday the GOV 'quietly' posted the FACTUAL TRUTH that the Covid PCR tests being used CANNOT determine if any virus is still inside your body.
It is comparable to the Police forensics team checking a room for a suspects DNA. But they cannot determine if the suspect was in the room 5 years ago or had been there today and had just killed someone.
Dr Kary Mullis the inventor of the PCR test and Nobel Prize winner (who coincidentally died last year) and over 20,000 other INDEPENDENT scientists have been SHOUTING this FACT since 1 January!!
Source: Document

Get yourself fully behind the greatest movement for freedom we have ever seen in this land - sign up here

It has been muted there could be millions in the country willing to mobilise their numbers to crack open the secrecy and BS we have been showered with for so long. Get on the list make it another million here -  JOIN PUB HERE

Let us have your ideas for non compliance action lawful and peaceful but very, very disruptive, enough to make the compliant MSM feature it..... Let us know here

Everything you need to know about the lawful challenge to return the Common Law       read full story here

The Barrister engaged for the criminal Fraud case of history is set to serve the summons to court against, primarily the Cabinet and No 10 aides this week's end. This will mean that individual criminal cases against the alleged Prime Minister, his closest allies in this pandemic fraud will be served injunction to house arrest and no travel outside Great Britain

Get your 5 sec clip of saying I am Sovereign.We are compiling a viral video of 100s of people old young mums dads kids saying to camera I AM SOVEREIGN - Get yours in rapido! HERE

In order to break the spell cast on the British people that what we have all suffered has been and is real a major campaign of non compliance and national strikes will take place all across the land. Too many have been hypnotised by media and propaganda to believe this is real. We intend to break that spell and get the people of Britain to see the reality they have been denied JOIN PUB HERE

Let us have your ideas for non compliance action lawful and peaceful but very, very disruptive, enough to make the compliant MSM feature it..... Let us know here

Michael O'Bernicia gives storming interview to Mark Devlin. This makes this unstoppable, so share everywhere. You asked what you could do and How to help - This is your moment - SHARE Like there is no tomorrow

Major Twitter/FB/Social Media campaign launched against BBC and MSM for remaining silent on greatest criminal proceedings in the history of these sovereign isles! - see how you can help

Barristers across the Land are scrambling and desperate to handle the historic fraud case launched this last week against the British Parliament - the Mother of All Parliaments found desperately wanting and in a 100% illegal position - the power of truth!

A terrific light hearted short video to encourage people behind Magna Carta 2020 and the newly formed PUB The Peoples Union of Britain, which will be leading the take down of this present tyranny Watch here and share

Last week we received confirmation that the barrister and her full Chambers are starting proceedings for fraud against the British Cabinet and this will include injunctions for the house arrest of all MPs and the subsequent closure of this illegal Parliament

Top Barrister Dealing with Private Criminal Fraud Internationally agrees to take Brief for charges against Parliament and all sitting MPs plus all those associated or seen to be party with the fraud....
see more

ALL 657 MPs served Private Criminal Prosecution Notices 30-9-20 read full story here

We are entering the most momentous time in our history, where truth confronts Lies, Evil is brought to book. What happens in these Isles over the next few months will literally change the course of history - We run an almost daily update of events

Join us all, witness and become an integral part of history unveiled, as truth destroys all lies, untruths and tyrannical imposition to all Sovereign People. This will give you access to personally bear witness and be part of the largest manifestation of People Power, Sovereign Power and Change as never experienced before.

The Criminals Are Going Down

All 657 MPs served notice of private criminal prosecution for fraud on September 30th are now being prosecuted, Cabinet first, then all who are party to the fraud. That includes the likes of Government health advisors, No 10 advisors, Cummings et al. This is going to close down Parliament and keep MPs under house arrest. No one will be missed, no one will be missed - cue Gilbert and Sullivan

Parliament Taken Down Common Law replaces

MOB Talks To Del Bigtree About Vaxx Adverse Events

Del Bigtree is one of the preeminent voices of the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. His career as an Emmy winning producer of the CBS talk show, The Doctors, changed profoundly when he produced the documentary, Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe, which is credited with igniting a revolution against pharmaceutical tyranny around the world.

Share This Page!


The numbers being the Pandemic Fraud perpetrated by the British Government - Mark is probably one of the most incisive investigators into the "numbers " behind things. This is seriously damaging for the Government and all associated with this fraud

Share This Page!

Michael O'Bernicia interviewed
by Yogeeta Mistry

Michael O'Bernicia reveals the groundbreaking lawful actions that formed the background that led, over at least twelve years to him being able to face the alleged present government and challenge them in a criminal, historic  prosecution for fraud. 

Share This Page!

BREAKING: Mark Devlin Interviews Michael O'Bernicia on 4th November

Michael O'Bernicia makes out a powerful and potent case for what lies ahead in this exceptional broadcast with Mark Devlin on 4th November 2020

Share This Page!

BREAKING: Mark Devlin Interviews Michael O'Bernicia on the road to Freedom

Michael O'Bernicia lays out the road to freedom, what we all must do, how we can bring this tyrannical regime down and bring the Common Law back into prime position

Share This Page!

Jonathan Trapman, founder of The Freedom Cycle declares Common Law

On that most celebrated date 5th November 2020 Jonathan declares the Common Law to be reinstated as the only law of the land in the British Isles. A state of affairs brought on by their being no lawful government for the people as its declared illegitimacy under Common Law establishes that.

Share This Page!

Latest Developments

Parliament Being Taken Down

Wednesday 30 September will be remembered not for a pathetic attempt to extend the tyranny of an illegal regime on a Free Sovereign People, but for the firast step to indicting and serving all MPs in an unprecedented display of lawful take down
..... Read more here

MOB at The Freedom Cycle

Michael O'Bernicia

Why This Case is Solid - Prior Wins

In the summer of 2013, I ran a Private Criminal Prosecution against the LPA Receivers who stole nine of my family's properties, on behalf of Bank of Scotland.
..... Read more

Michael O'Bernicia at The Freedom Cycle

Michael O'Bernicia

COVID-1984 Private Criminal Prosecution UPDATE:

The barrister has now agreed in principal to take the case and we will move forward on Monday, when she will present it to her partners...... Read more

Michael O'Bernicia  at The Freedom Cycle

Revoking Consent to Be Governed

Important Announcement - Friday 9th October 2020

I have major progress to report. A senior barrister who specialises in private criminal prosecutions for fraud has asked for a telephone appointment this afternoon, to talk about taking on the pandemic fraud case against all the MP's who didn't vote to end the Coronavirus Act 2020....Read more

Michael O'Bernicia at The Freedom Cycle

Michael O'Bernicia

Important Announce

Bear Witness to the moment in history when the sovereign people of these isles take back, reinstate the Common Law as The Law of Our Lands
Watch the video here

Jonathan Trapman at The Freedom Cycle

Jonathan Trapman

All Aboard for The Take Down Express

The whole of the British Parliament is on course for being indicted for fraud
Those responsible for enacting the biggest population scam in history are about to get their comeuppance
- read more

Jonathan Trapman at The Freedom Cycle

Jonathan Trapman

Revoking Consent to be Governed

In August 2008 CE, I came to a seemingly inevitable crossroads in this present incarnation. Read full article here

Michael O'Bernicia  at The Freedom Cycle

Revoking Consent to Be Governed




Share This Page!

Magna Carta 2020 The Freedom Isles

Our Sovereign and Freedom Isles - JOIN US HERE

Join, Witness and Be Part of History

The long struggle and Journey to Freedom and our  true Sovereign Being is drawing closer to victory. Magna Carta 2020 has sealed a historic signing and ratification of the return to the Common Law, Sovereignty of the People and the end of tyranny and treasonous acts. Our Isles are being returned to us - BE THERE, WITNESS IT and make all future generations proud of this monumental moment in our collective history... The Declaration of Rights - watch video

Share This Page!


As it Happens - Your Part is to share the Bejesus out of this!

Murderous Attempt By Three Duplicitous Traitors To Steal PCP Evidence

This podcast with Mark Devlin interviewing Michael O'Bernicia is an explosive reveal of truth like no other - watch and share
Listen to it here

Murderous Attempt By Three Duplicitous Traitors To Steal PCP Evidence

You do not need James Bond to reveal the nature of treachery and duplicity revealed by this latest update from Michael O'Bernicia concerning the Private Criminal Prosecution (PCP)......
Read it here

Share This Page!

Why This Case is Solid

Prior Wins

In the summer of 2013, I ran a Private Criminal Prosecution against the LPA Receivers who stole nine of my family's properties, on behalf of Bank of Scotland.

Despite never having done so before, with no legal training whatsoever, the information was laid at North Shields Magistrates, alleging fraud by false representation under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 and trespass with conversion.
We were told that it was the first PCP ever started at that court, so the staff [including its legals advisers] were more than a little perturbed when we told them I would be prosecuting in the name of the trustees of my family's property trust, under limited powers of attorney.

Needless to say, when a hearing was listed before a district judge, the bank, for and on behalf of the receivers, had filed three applications:
1. They applied for the case to be struck out as vexatious.
2. They applied for a Wasted Costs Order against my name only.
3. They applied for a Press Reporting restriction.

Without even looking at the evidence or hearing my submissions, the judge started to grant the first application, when my adversaries' barrister rose and asked if he could speak.

The judge had no objection, so the barrister proceeded to tell him that, despite being bound by his code of conduct to proceed as instructed, he would not have advised them that I could in any way be described as a vexatious litigant.
Why did he do such a thing? Because I collared him before the hearing and explained the lies that his clients had told him, showing him the evidence they had failed to disclose. In other words, I let him know he was working for white collar criminals.

Shocked by the intervention, the judge backed down and started to deal with the second application for a Wasted Costs Order against my name only, so it was my turn to intervene:
"You realise that I am not appearing today in my name, don't you sir? I mean, I am here appearing for the trustees under power of attorney, so technically, I'm not even present in court to have a Wasted Costs Order issued against me."

To which he replied with a bluster: "I'm not going anywhere near that one with a barge pole!"

He then adjourned the hearing and passed the buck to the most senior district judge at a second hearing.

The second hearing was an entirely different experience, since the senior district judge had actually read the evidence and my skeleton argument before the hearing.

Before I presented the prosecution's case, he told me that he had to deal with the three other applications by the defendants. He then turned to their newly appointed barrister [under strict instructions not to talk to me under any circumstances] and summarily dismissed each of them, without discussion.

Over the next forty minutes, I laid out the evidence of fraud and trespass, during which the judge took copious notes, along with the clerk. When I finished, he looked at me with half a smile and said:
"Well, just as I suspected when I read the papers you drafted before this hearing, despite the fact that the civil courts have taken a different view, I find nothing vexatious whatsoever to justify the defendants' applications against you.
From the courteous manner in which you have addressed the court, to the substantive and concise nature of your arguments, you have put the majority of my profession to shame.
In fact, despite not having known that it is perfectly lawful for such proceedings to be prosecuted under powers of attorney, prior to these proceedings, I would be more than happy for you to do so in my court, whenever necessary and appropriate in future.

Nevertheless, he regretfully informed me that he was bound by statute to presume that all the fraudulent mortgages were valid, merely because they were registered at the Land Registry. But not without adding the following caveat to his decision to stay the proceedings indefinitely:
"If just one of those mortgages is cancelled by the Land Registry, then the defendants [including the bank's directors] will have to defend the allegations of fraud and trespass before a jury."

In January 2015, the Land Registry cancelled one of the two remaining fraudulent mortgages, before the bank finally capitulated to our allegations of fraud in February 2019, when they cancelled the void mortgage over my sister's family home.

This means that we are at liberty to have the stay on the private criminal prosecution against James Crosby et al lifted at any time. In the event my dad hadn't been recovering from quadruple bypass surgery for the past 18 months, we already would have had that done.

However, my point being that even if that never happens, for whatever reason, the case taught me everything I need to know about running the private criminal prosecution against Parliament [and the Land Registrars in the TGBMS Class Actions], on almost identical charges of fraud.

Share This Page!


Friday 9th October 2020

I have major progress to report. A senior barrister who specialises in private criminal prosecutions for fraud has asked for a telephone appointment this afternoon, to talk about taking on the pandemic fraud case against all the MP's who didn't vote to end the Coronavirus Act 2020.

Having already read the summary of the case, as well as the Notice of Intended Private Criminal Prosecution they were all served last week, this is an emphatic indication that they recognise that the arguments have merit. Otherwise, it would have been a polite "thanks, but no thanks".

In the event they take the case, they will first have to agree to take instructions from myself, rather than a firm of solicitors, which is the non-negotiable condition of the complainant's engagement of their services.

However, the case is very simple to understand and prosecute - each MP relied upon [and then caused the People to rely upon], a series of dishonest statements, which caused the deaths of untold thousands, destroyed the economy and enabled unaccountable and tyrannical government, in breach of section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the Treason Felony Act 1348 and articles 1 and 2 of the Bill of Rights 1689.

Watch this space for further details as they unfold this afternoon and rest assured that when [not if] these allegations are presented in a criminal court, there is no jury that wouldn't convict every MP, as charged.

Share This Page!


The End Of Times 
Beginning of Time

When the world cries out for evolution and those calling for it are not the ones having run the show for millennia
you know things are serious and at crunch point

Fortunately IT IS up to you
An eternal FACT - You are a Free  and Sovereign Being
NOW ESTABLISH IT!    - Discover how


And on that day I looked and it was so. And I saw it was not only good but brilliant!

Share This Page!

Dreams and Realities A book for our time


Jonathan Trapman

Jonathan L Trapman is an author, creative writer and photojournalist who has spent the better part of his 45 odd years in public life, learning from his personal experiences, sharing them, listening to others, whose lives have allowed him to open his own mind to a beauty, even within horror, that is transforming and empowering. His written work endeavors to convey, through true tales and fiction, impressions thus garnered. Dreams and Realities can be purchased (signed by the author if wanted) here.

The Freedom Cycle

© 2021 The Freedom Cycle


Address: Glastonbury, Somerset UK
Phone: (UK)
+44 (0)1225 29 2333
Phone: (US)
+1 864-372-4820
[email protected]